2016-10-11 09:38, Neil Horman: > This also begs the question in my mind, is it really worth changing the macro? > I really don't think it is. The registration macros are pretty descriptive as > they stand, and have already changed 3 or 4 times in the last 6 months, which > suggests to me that any change here is really just churn more than meaningful > change. You can make the argument that the name might be more in line with > the > library its implemented in or what not, but in truth, its easy to understand > what the macros do (in their previous or current incantations), and any change > that just makes them the same as other macros in their naming is really more > trouble than its worth.
Neil, the long term goal is to stop having some identifiers which do not start with RTE_ in our exported .h files. I think it is a reasonable policy, for a library, to live in a well defined namespace.
