> > 2016-12-12 11:51, Ananyev, Konstantin: > > > > The application gets few information from tx_prepare() about what should > > > > be done to make the packet accepted by the hw, and the actions will > > > > probably be different depending on hardware. > > > > That's true. > > I am open to suggestions how in future to provide extra information to the > > upper layer. > > Set rte_errno to different values depending on type of error, > > OR extra parameter in tx_prepare() that will provide more detailed error > > information, > > OR something else? > > That's one of the reason which give me a feeling that it is safer > to introduce tx_prepare as an experimental API in 17.02. > So the users will know that it can change in the next release. > What do you think?
I think that's the good reason and I am ok with it. Konstantin