> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Qiming Yang > Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 9:06 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org; thomas.monja...@6wind.com > Cc: Horton, Remy <remy.hor...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh > <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ethtool: dispaly bus info and firmware version > > This patch enhances the ethtool example to support to show bus information > and firmware version, in the same way that the Linux kernel ethtool does. > > Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.y...@intel.com> > --- > v3 changes: > * split this patch from the patch set of rte_eth_dev_fw_info_get > use the new version function. > --- > --- > examples/ethtool/ethtool-app/ethapp.c | 2 ++ > examples/ethtool/lib/rte_ethtool.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/examples/ethtool/ethtool-app/ethapp.c > b/examples/ethtool/ethtool-app/ethapp.c > index 6aeaa06..192d941 100644 > --- a/examples/ethtool/ethtool-app/ethapp.c > +++ b/examples/ethtool/ethtool-app/ethapp.c > @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ pcmd_drvinfo_callback(__rte_unused void *ptr_params, > printf("Port %i driver: %s (ver: %s)\n", > id_port, info.driver, info.version > ); > + printf("bus-info: %s\n", info.bus_info);
This patch has dependence on your get_fw_version patch set. I think you may misunderstand Ferruh's comments, I think what he said was ask you to remove bus-info print (above line) from that patch set, but keep firmware version print. Thanks Jingjing
