Hi, John > -----Original Message----- > From: Mcnamara, John > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 10:38 PM > To: Mcnamara, John <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: move i40e know issue to new file > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mcnamara, John > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 2:33 PM > > To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > Cc: Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: move i40e know issue to new file > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Qiming Yang > > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 4:41 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming > > > <[email protected]> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: move i40e know issue to new file > > > > > > This patch moved i40e related know issues from doc/guides/rel_notes/ > > > known_issues.rst to driver/net/i40e/i40e_know_issues.rst, makes us > > > easy to track the issue about i40e. > > > > > > That's good. Someone should probably check if there are other cases > > like this in the last 3-4 releases and move them as well. > > > > Sorry. I missed the fact that this was going to a new, i40e, specific file. > I don't think that is a good idea. Maybe there could be a new i40e section in > the known issues doc but I don't think that we should introduce a new file. > > John
You are right, it's no need to introduce a new file, but Wenzhuo told me an exist doc doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst. What do you think to move the i40e relate known issues to this doc? Qiming
