Hi Qi, <snip>
> > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Zhang, Qi Z > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:43 PM > > > To: Iremonger, Bernard <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > > Cc: Xing, Beilei <[email protected]>; Lu, Wenzhuo > > > <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi <[email protected]>; Iremonger, > > > Bernard <[email protected]> > > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix to ensure vector mode > > > is not used > > > > > > Hi Bernard: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bernard > > > Iremonger > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:01 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Cc: Xing, Beilei <[email protected]>; Lu, Wenzhuo > > > > <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi <[email protected]>; > Iremonger, > > > > Bernard <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix to ensure vector mode is > > > > not used > > > > > > > > In rx vector mode, the QinQ VLAN tag is not stripped. > > > > When hw_vlan_extend is set for QinQ ensure that rx vector mode is > > > > not selected. > > > > > > > > Fixes: ca74903b75cf ("net/i40e: extract non-x86 specific code from > > > > vector > > > > driver") > > > > > > Why fixes? I didn't see above commit change rx callback function if > > > hw_vlan_extend == 1 > > > > Some of the QinQ functionality was introduced in 17.02, this > > functionality also has the same issue. > > So I added a fixes line. > > If you think this patch is a fix, you need to find the commit that introduce > this > issue The commit ca74903b75cf is not the root cause of the issue, it just move > the code from I40e_rxtx_vec.c to i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h > > Regards > Qi > This is a fix to the i40e_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check_default() function. The issue is caused because there is no check on the hw_vlan_extend flag at present. This is the correct fixline for that function. ca74903b75 (Jianbo Liu 2016-10-14 09:30:00 +0530 221) i40e_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check_default(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) I will send a v2 as I should have added the "Cc: [email protected]" line. Regards, Bernard.
