On 30/06/2017 2:47 PM, Declan Doherty wrote:
On 30/06/2017 2:52 AM, RongQiang Xie wrote:
In function cmd_show_bonding_config_parsed() use number
represent the bond type,in order more detailed,add bond
type description otherwise we may confused about the number
type.
And also,The primary port just use in mode active backup
and tlb,so,when the mode is the active backup or tlb we
show the primary port info.
Signed-off-by: RongQiang Xie <xie.rongqi...@zte.com.cn>
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 4eac498..1ae5fc0 100755
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -4455,6 +4455,7 @@ static void cmd_show_bonding_config_parsed(void
*parsed_result,
printf("\tActive Slaves: []\n");
}
+
if (bonding_mode == BONDING_MODE_ACTIVE_BACKUP ||
bonding_mode == BONDING_MODE_TLB) {
primary_id = rte_eth_bond_primary_get(port_id);
Hey, I think you are missing some of your intended changes in this
patch? I'm only seeing a white space addition. Also the body of your
email seems to be merged with the emails subject line.
Thanks
Declan
Sorry you can disregard above. It seems that my email client (Mozilla
Thunderbird) is having difficultly with some of the characters in the
email and isn't rendering it correctly for me, your patches look fine in
patchwork, so I'll review from there.
Declan
