On 9/15/2017 10:18 AM, Yang, Qiming wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 4:43 PM
>> To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]; Tan, Jianfeng <[email protected]>; Thotton, Shijith
>> <[email protected]>; Hu, Xuekun <[email protected]>; Yigit,
>> Ferruh <[email protected]>; Patil, Harish <[email protected]>;
>> Gregory Etelson <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vf init issue with patch igb_uio: issue FLR during 
>> open
>> and release of device file
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> 15/09/2017 10:04, Yang, Qiming:
>>> Hi, Thomas
>>> We meet a urgent issue because of Shijith's patch.
>>> When use DPDK version 17.08, DPDK VF driver and kernel PF driver, i40e, 
>>> ixgbe
>> and qede(Harish said) VF all meet initial failure.
>>
>> This patch has been integrated in DPDK 17.08-rc2 (2 months ago).
>> Why a so obvious issue is discovered only now?
>>
>>> This issue only occurred when use 17.08 igb_uio, vfio-pci and 17.05 igb_uio 
>>> all
>> works well.
>>> Considering this issue will block our vf driver develop and test work, 
>>> could we
>> revert this patch first and find another appropriate way?
>>
>> We need to be sure the revert is the right solution because it will be 
>> backported
>> to the stable 17.08 release.
>>
>> Shijith suggests to "try removing pci_reset_function from igbuio_pci_open."
>> Can we try this first?
>> Are we sure the bug is not in new firmwares?
> 
> I have tried to remove pci_reset_function, it works in my environment, but it 
> doesn't work in someone's enviroment.
> And removing this function won't it changes the original purpose of his 
> patch?  So I'm not sure it is a good solution.

Yes, removing that will be functionally almost same with revert.

> This bug is not a firmware version related issue, we can reproduce stably 
> with older firmware.

I also think this is not related to the firmware.
But I don't see why works with one version of the Linux PF driver, but
not other.

> 
> Qiming
> 

Reply via email to