On 6/21/2017 6:25 PM, jingjing.wu at intel.com (Wu, Jingjing) wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rsanford2 at gmail.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 4:43 AM
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] testpmd: fix LACP ports to work with idle 
>> links
>>
>> Problem: When there is little or no TX traffic on an LACP port (bonding mode 
>> 4),
>> we don't call its tx burst function in a timely manner, and thus we don't
>> transmit LACPDUs when we should.
>>
>> Solution: Add and maintain an "lacp_master" flag in rte_port struct.
>> In the main packet forwarding loop, if port is an LACP master, in 1 out of N
>> loops force an empty call to the tx burst API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Sanford <rsanford at akamai.com>
>> ---
>>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c |    9 +++++++++
>>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.h |    4 ++++
>>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
>> f90befc..2a629ee 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> @@ -3975,6 +3975,10 @@ static void cmd_set_bonding_mode_parsed(void
>> *parsed_result,
>>      /* Set the bonding mode for the relevant port. */
>>      if (0 != rte_eth_bond_mode_set(port_id, res->value))
>>              printf("\t Failed to set bonding mode for port = %d.\n", 
>> port_id);
>> +    else if (res->value == BONDING_MODE_8023AD)
>> +            set_port_lacp_master(port_id);
>> +    else
>> +            clear_port_lacp_master(port_id);
>>  }
>>
>>  cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_setbonding_mode_set = @@ -4408,6
>> +4412,11 @@ static void cmd_create_bonded_device_parsed(void
>> *parsed_result,
>>              reconfig(port_id, res->socket);
>>              rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(port_id);
>>              ports[port_id].enabled = 1;
>> +
>> +            if (res->mode == BONDING_MODE_8023AD)
>> +                    set_port_lacp_master(port_id);
>> +            else
>> +                    clear_port_lacp_master(port_id);
>>      }
>>
>>  }
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
>> 1428974..806667e 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>> @@ -920,12 +920,28 @@ run_pkt_fwd_on_lcore(struct fwd_lcore *fc,
>> packet_fwd_t pkt_fwd)
>>      struct fwd_stream **fsm;
>>      streamid_t nb_fs;
>>      streamid_t sm_id;
>> +    unsigned int loop_count = 0;
>>
>>      fsm = &fwd_streams[fc->stream_idx];
>>      nb_fs = fc->stream_nb;
>>      do {
>>              for (sm_id = 0; sm_id < nb_fs; sm_id++)
>>                      (*pkt_fwd)(fsm[sm_id]);
>> +
>> +            /*
>> +             * Per rte_eth_bond.h, we must invoke LACP master's tx
>> +             * burst function at least once every 100 ms.
>> +             */
>> +            loop_count++;
>> +            if (likely(loop_count % 1024 != 0))
>> +                    continue;
>> +            for (sm_id = 0; sm_id < nb_fs; sm_id++) {
>> +                    struct fwd_stream *fs = fsm[sm_id];
>> +
>> +                    if (port_is_lacp_master(fs->tx_port))
>> +                            rte_eth_tx_burst(fs->tx_port, fs->tx_queue,
>> +                                             NULL, 0);
>> +            }
> By add tx_burst here will change default logic. Some fwd engine are usually 
> used to measure
> Performance . Additional cycle in fast path may impact that. It would be 
> better to move additional
> sending to your fwd engine.

Hi Robert,

This patchset is older than a year and not responded back to latest comments.

Is this still a valid patch?
Do you have any objection to remove this from patchwork?

Thanks,
ferruh

Reply via email to