-----Original Message----- > Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:41:13 +0530 > From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> > To: dev@dpdk.org > CC: jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com, olivier.m...@6wind.com, > santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com > Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] mbuf: pktmbuf pool create helper for specific > mempool ops > X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 > > Introduce a new helper for pktmbuf pool, which will allow > the application to optionally specify the mempool ops name > as well. > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> > --- > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 23 ++++++++++++++------ > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 42 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map | 1 + > 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c > index fd3b6f5..482676c 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c > @@ -186,15 +186,15 @@ rte_mbuf_best_mempool_ops(void) > return RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS; > } > > -/* helper to create a mbuf pool */ > +/* helper to create a mbuf pool with given mempool ops*/ > struct rte_mempool * > -rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(const char *name, unsigned n, > - unsigned cache_size, uint16_t priv_size, uint16_t data_room_size, > - int socket_id) > +rte_pktmbuf_pool_create_specific(const char *name, unsigned int n,
No strong opinion on name. I think, rte_pktmbuf_pool_create_by_op() may be a better name than rte_pktmbuf_pool_create_specific() > + unsigned int cache_size, uint16_t priv_size, uint16_t data_room_size, > + int socket_id, const char *ops_name)
