Hi Yuanhan, On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:30:06PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition > in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev > name. This breaks the typical OVS DPDK use case and brings more puzzle > to the end users. > > To fix it, this patch changes it to use PCI BDF as the name, too. > Also, a postfix " port %u" is added, just in case their might be more > than 1 port assoicated with a PCI device.
Seems only ixgbe, sfc, szedata2 use it whereas ark, bnxt, mlx4, mlx5, mrvl, softnic don't. Why not addressing all drivers at once? > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Nelio Laranjeiro <[email protected]> -- Nélio Laranjeiro 6WIND

