On 1/13/2016 4:49 PM, stephen at networkplumber.org (Stephen Hemminger) wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:07:08 +0000
> Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
>> So, while the two-tab indent may look "a bit weird" it does solve the two 
>> issues
>> above. I believe practical benefits should override initial impressions. [It 
>> took
>> me a while to get used to also, but now I very much like it as a style.]
> I don't think that deviating from kernel style for this case is justified.

This is very old patch still sitting in patchwork, re-visiting it mainly to be
able to clean the patchwork.

This is a syntax change request and although I have my personal preferences I
would be OK with whatever decided.

Currently there is already a decided syntax, changing it after this point will
cause either mixed usage or a big syntax cleanup patch. I think both are not 

I am for continue whatever documented in current DPDK coding style doc, hence
NAK from my side.


Reply via email to