On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Williams: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chas Williams >> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2018 1:22 AM >> To: Zhang, Helin <helin.zh...@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Ananyev, >> Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Charles (Chas) Williams >> <ch...@att.com> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: update data->eth_link status on >> start >> >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Zhang, Helin <helin.zh...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chas Williams >> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 6:56 AM >> >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> >> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo; Ananyev, Konstantin; Charles (Chas) Williams >> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: update data->eth_link status >> >> on start >> >> >> >> From: "Charles (Chas) Williams" <ch...@att.com> >> >> >> >> dev->data->eth_link isn't updated until the first interrupt. If a >> >> link is carrier down, then this interrupt may never happen. Before >> >> we finished starting the PMD, call ixgbe_dev_link_update() to ensure we >> have a valid status. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <ch...@att.com> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 4 ++++ >> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c >> >> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c >> >> index 37eb668..27d29dc 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c >> >> @@ -2666,6 +2666,8 @@ ixgbe_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) >> >> if (err) >> >> goto error; >> >> >> >> + ixgbe_dev_link_update(dev, 0); >> > It is called in rte_eth_dev_start() if lsc is not enabled, and it is >> > not needed here to avoid any duplication. >> > BTW, did you see any issue or just check the code? Thanks! >> >> Yes, I see an issue with bonding. If LSC is enabled, then link_status isn't >> set >> until the first interrupt to update the link status. If a link is down, this >> interrupt may never happen result in link_status being somewhat undefined. > > Is your issue only happened on VF? > For PF, I saw ixgbe_check_link is called at ixgbe_dev_start, so link status > is assume be updated. > If you think it is just missed in VF, can you implemented this in the similar > way as PF?
No, I don't believe it's isolated to VF. ixgbe_check_link() doesn't update (atomically write) the dev->data->dev_link. After .dev_start() finishes, I need the link_status of the adapter to be set. I can't wait until I hope the first interrupt has happened that would update dev->data->dev_link. How long would I wait? I don't really care if the link is down, or up, or whatever, but it can't be partially filled in. Bonding (in 802.3ad) wants the links to be similarly configured. > > Regards > Qi > >> >> > >> > /Helin >> > >> >> + >> >> skip_link_setup: >> >> >> >> if (rte_intr_allow_others(intr_handle)) { @@ -5033,6 +5035,8 @@ >> >> ixgbevf_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) >> >> >> >> ixgbevf_dev_rxtx_start(dev); >> >> >> >> + ixgbevf_dev_link_update(dev, 0); >> >> + >> >> /* check and configure queue intr-vector mapping */ >> >> if (rte_intr_cap_multiple(intr_handle) && >> >> dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq) { >> >> -- >> >> 2.9.5 >> >