On 4/2/2018 11:25 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> Update bnxt PMD to new ethdev offloads API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
> --
> v1->v2: return an error if requested offload flags do not
> match supported offload capabilities.
> v2->v3: modify the code based on review comments.
<...>
> @@ -516,6 +526,20 @@ static void bnxt_dev_info_get_op(struct rte_eth_dev
> *eth_dev,
> static int bnxt_dev_configure_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> {
> struct bnxt *bp = (struct bnxt *)eth_dev->data->dev_private;
> + uint64_t tx_offloads = eth_dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
> + uint64_t rx_offloads = eth_dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
> +
> + if (tx_offloads != (tx_offloads & BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT)) {
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
> + tx_offloads, BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT);
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> + }
> +
> + if (rx_offloads != (rx_offloads & BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT)) {
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
> + rx_offloads, BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT);
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> + }
This is causing i686 build error [1].
[1]
In file included from .../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:43:0:
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c: In function ‘bnxt_dev_configure_op’:
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:341:50: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of
type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long
unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
rte_log(RTE_LOG_ ## level, bnxt_logtype_driver, "%s(): " fmt, \
^
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:345:2: note: in expansion of macro
‘PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW’
PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW(level, fmt, ## args)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:528:3: note: in expansion of macro
‘PMD_DRV_LOG’
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
^~~~~~~~~~~
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:528:47: note: format string is defined
here
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
~~^
%llx
In file included from .../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:43:0:
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:341:50: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of
type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long
unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
rte_log(RTE_LOG_ ## level, bnxt_logtype_driver, "%s(): " fmt, \
^
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:345:2: note: in expansion of macro
‘PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW’
PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW(level, fmt, ## args)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:534:3: note: in expansion of macro
‘PMD_DRV_LOG’
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
^~~~~~~~~~~
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:534:47: note: format string is defined
here
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
~~^
%llx
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
