There seems to be a developing consensus. Ultimately, we will need a
resolution which would be better coming from the PMC rather than being
imposed by the board. You may need more time to prepare it and confirm
the consensus. If so, perhaps a very simple report saying something like
Apache DRAT is not active and the PMC plans to offer a resolution next
month?
On 7/8/2020 10:15 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
Thank you Roy.
Yeah just DRAT would be fine.
Appreciated and will await the outcome.
Thanks,
Chris
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <field...@gbiv.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:13 AM
To: Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
Cc: "dev@drat.apache.org" <dev@drat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
continue ASF development on DRAT.
If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
more than simple consideration there.
Thank you for your consideration.
Chris
Hi Chris,
Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
Cheers,
....Roy
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
