> On Jan. 20, 2015, 2:52 a.m., Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> > exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/SendingAccountor.java,
> >  line 54
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30059/diff/1/?file=825995#file825995line54>
> >
> >     Synchronized is fine.  You can remove comments.

Roger.


> On Jan. 20, 2015, 2:52 a.m., Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> > exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/SendingAccountor.java,
> >  line 94
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30059/diff/1/?file=825995#file825995line94>
> >
> >     Yes, it should.

Roger.


- Daniel


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30059/#review68685
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 20, 2015, 12:45 a.m., Daniel Barclay wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30059/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 20, 2015, 12:45 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for drill, Jacques Nadeau and Jason Altekruse.
> 
> 
> Repository: drill-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Technical change:  Added "synchronized" to  increment().
> 
> Other changes:  Documentation and renaming for clarity.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/SendingAccountor.java
>  7af7b65 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30059/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran developer and QA tests; got no errors other than errors that appear for 
> master branch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel Barclay
> 
>

Reply via email to