The enforcer plugin should be make sure that banned dependencies are not
included.  This is on purpose and should not be changed.

Because of the nature of our dependencies, you have to do a mvn install at
the root before you can assume a sub module level action will work.
Otherwise, sub module behaviors may source from an old version stored in
your .m2 repo.

Did you do a mvn clean install at the root level before you ran this
command?

I don't think there is any mistake based on what you've described above.
It sounds like you pulled down the latest code then tried to do a partial
build.  There was a patch that went in this morning related to DRILL-2841
to make sure this dependency is never include in Drill as it breaks the web
ui.


On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Daniel Barclay <[email protected]>
wrote:

> After just rebasing on master today, I started getting this validation
> error:
>
> ...
> [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce (avoid_bad_dependencies) @
> drill-jdbc ---
> [WARNING] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.BannedDependencies
> failed with message:
> Found Banned Dependency: org.mortbay.jetty:servlet-api:jar:2.5-20081211
> Use 'mvn dependency:tree' to locate the source of the banned dependencies.
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> ...
>
> (The output of" mvn dependency:tree" didn't contain
> "org.mortbay.jetty:servlet-api".)
>
>
>
> That was from executing the command:
>
>   mvn clean ; (cd exec/jdbc ; mvn validate)
>
> (It doesn't happen with a root-level mvn validate.)
>
>
> Even when I switch to my locally unmodified copy of master, I get that
> message.
>
>
>
> NOTE:  The template
> exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/templates/RepeatedValueVectors.java
> includes this reference to a Jetty servlet class/interface:
>
>   import org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Holder;
>
> Is that intentional?
>
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel Barclay
> MapR Technologies
>

Reply via email to