> On March 19, 2015, 6:35 p.m., Jinfeng Ni wrote:
> > exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/aggregate/HashAggBatch.java,
> >  line 72
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32248/diff/1/?file=900140#file900140line72>
> >
> >     Can you show example where you will expect to see "*" in the aggregate 
> > expression? For distinct * over schemaless table, I assume the * will 
> > appear in the GroupBy keys, not in the aggregated expressions. For count(*) 
> > as the agg expression, planner will replace * with a constant. So, I could 
> > not see why it is necessary to check if there is star in the aggregated 
> > expression.
> 
> Sean Hsuan-Yi Chu wrote:
>     Oh... I was not aware of the planner's smart substitution of * in that 
> case.
>     
>     As of now, I agree with you. But let me think more about it. Thanks.

This issue was outdated and got resolved in the latest patch


> On March 19, 2015, 6:35 p.m., Jinfeng Ni wrote:
> > exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/TestExampleQueries.java, line 
> > 747
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32248/diff/1/?file=900143#file900143line747>
> >
> >     Have you consider the case where * comes from join?
> >     
> >     select distinct * from dept, emp where ...
> >     
> >     Seems the code you added will not work properly for such case.
> 
> Sean Hsuan-Yi Chu wrote:
>     Hmmm~ I am not sure why that case could fail. 
>     
>     As soon as Aggr sees '*' in the plan, it knows it should group-by respect 
> to all the columns. This logic seems to hold for JOIN as well to me.
>     
>     Besides, I tried some simple casesm such as:
>     
>     String queryDistinct = String.format("select distinct * " +
>                   "from dfs.`%s` t1, dfs.`%s` t2 " +
>                   "where (t1.a1 = t2.a1);", root, root);
>     (t1 and t2 are simply .json)
>     
>     DRILL gave the same result as Postgres.

A test case was added


- Sean Hsuan-Yi


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32248/#review77076
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 28, 2015, 10:38 p.m., Sean Hsuan-Yi Chu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32248/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 28, 2015, 10:38 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for drill, Aman Sinha and Jinfeng Ni.
> 
> 
> Bugs: DRILL-2139
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2139
> 
> 
> Repository: drill-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Expand * at the run time
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/aggregate/AggregateUtils.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/aggregate/HashAggBatch.java
>  e1b5909 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/aggregate/StreamingAggBatch.java
>  b252971 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/xsort/ExternalSortBatch.java
>  8871a5f 
>   exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/TestDistinctStar.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/TestExampleQueries.java 
> d80e752 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/agg/TestHashAggr.java
>  3786bfd 
>   exec/java-exec/src/test/resources/store/text/data/repeatedRows.json 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/test/resources/testframework/testDistinctStar/testSelectDistinct.tsv
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/test/resources/testframework/testDistinctStar/testSelectDistinctExpression.tsv
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/test/resources/testframework/testDistinctStar/testSelectDistinctOverJoin.tsv
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32248/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit and all QA tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sean Hsuan-Yi Chu
> 
>

Reply via email to