Empty skeletons? This project has working code.
Besides, in my limited survey of development methods, git clone dominates over maven archetypes among developers I know. On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Matt Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > How about Maven archetype(s) and/or Lazybones templates, with working code > examples instead of empty skeletons? Your examples below would make a > perfect project template, it works out of the box yet it is easily > refactored with an IDE for someone else's project. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 30, 2015, at 6:36 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > I just built the beginnings of a project to contain sample UDF > > implementations to minimize the startup time of people wanting to build > > their own. > > > > See https://github.com/mapr-demos/simple-drill-functions > > > > Ping me if there are improvements to be had. > > > > Also, I am curious how we should make this available. I would like for > it > > be outside of the normal drill distribution so that people can see what a > > stand-alone project should look like. > > > > This is related to the documentation which I found to be correct, but > less > > specific than it should be at the end (or beginning) where I think it > > should say: clone this repo, run these two commands and see something > work > > in drill. > > > > Any thoughts here? >
