> On June 18, 2015, 10:44 p.m., Sudheesh Katkam wrote:
> > exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/handlers/DefaultSqlHandler.java,
> >  line 157
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35629/diff/1/?file=987598#file987598line157>
> >
> >     Request: as part of this patch, since this method is doing more than 
> > logging, can you rename it to something more appropriate?
> 
> Jinfeng Ni wrote:
>     Agree. 
>     
>     If it's fine for you, I'll open a sepearte JIRA to make the change, since 
> it's a slightly different issue from the one that this JIRA is trying to 
> address.
> 
> Sudheesh Katkam wrote:
>     IMO the change is too small for a JIRA, and this patch does refactoring. 
> Anyway, I filed 
> [DRILL-3332](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3332) for this.
> 
> Jinfeng Ni wrote:
>     IMO, the change is more appropriate in DRILL-3319, which you filed days 
> ago, since they both handled the refactoring of logging issue in the code. 
> Mixed different things together would make it a bit harder for people to see 
> why the code is changed that way, especially months later when they checked 
> the descrpition of JIRA.

I was gonna make the change as part of that JIRA but I did not know the 
appropriate name. I agree that a patch should match the JIRA description. On 
the other hand, I hope we can get to resolve these small issues.


- Sudheesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35629/#review88449
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 20, 2015, 12:49 a.m., Jinfeng Ni wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35629/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 20, 2015, 12:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for drill and Venki Korukanti.
> 
> 
> Repository: drill-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> n this JIRA, we are going to refactor part of SqlHandler code in query 
> planning component, such that the same SELECT statement will go through the 
> same planning logic, whether it use DefaultSqlHandler, or CreateTableHandler, 
> or CreateViewHandler, or ExplainHandler.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/handlers/CreateTableHandler.java
>  2866b8c 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/handlers/DefaultSqlHandler.java
>  5e685c8 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/handlers/ExplainHandler.java
>  5924c7e 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/handlers/SqlHandlerUtil.java
>  3edcdb2 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/handlers/ViewHandler.java
>  0a3393e 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/parser/SqlCreateView.java
>  57cfde9 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/parser/SqlDropView.java
>  473dbcb 
>   
> exec/jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/jdbc/DatabaseMetaDataGetColumnsTest.java
>  5e59e8c 
>   
> exec/jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/jdbc/test/TestInformationSchemaColumns.java
>  3f820f5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35629/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit test.
> Pre-commit test. (Found cases where CTAS have different behaviour from 
> regular SELECT statement).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jinfeng Ni
> 
>

Reply via email to