There is Jira for (a) as well: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3045
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Aman Sinha <[email protected]> wrote: > We have had some issues where the same query run at different times > (possibly with other queries running concurrently...not sure about the > concurrency level) either performed partition pruning or did not. The > times where it failed happened due to couple of reasons : > (a) allocateNew() in the PruneScanRule failed with an out of memory > condition > (b) the interpreter evaluator encountered an error with a particular > expression type evaluation > > The PruneScanRule currently logs a warning message and does not fail the > query since this is a performance optimization. While we will address the > root cause of (a) and (b) (there's a JIRA open for (b) ) an important > issue is the inconsistent behavior of a query. > > Should we provide a system setting that allows the query to fail in this > situation ? > Note that other rules in the optimizer could also fail and some rules log > warnings but those failures are very rare, while PruneScan rule is doing > more complex operations - creating value vectors, doing interpreter > evaluation - so the chances of something failing increases. > > Aman >
