On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Daniel Barclay <[email protected]> wrote:
> In what sense is that not supported? For example, where would returning > zero columns be expected to break? > The system wasn't designed with this in mind. That is why the iterator validator ensures that this isn't happening. If you want to add this as a new supported behavior, I think you would need to create a set of tests around each of the operators ensuring this behavior works appropriately (before removing the iterator validation). I'm not sure how good the test coverage is for this scenario so I don't think running the units tests with this fundamental change is satisfactory for determining it is okay.
