+1
mvn clean install on mac and linux

tried a few queries on distributed mode.

Things looked fine

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Aman Sinha <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1.
> Downloaded the binary tar ball and installed on Mac.  Ran Drill in embedded
> mode.  Tested a few join, aggregation and limit queries against parquet
> data with and without metadata cache.  Tested cancellation for couple of
> queries.  Looked at query profiles on the WebUI.   Looks good.
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Abhijit Pol <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:41 PM, andrew <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding, non-comitter)
> > >
> > > > On Nov 6, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey Everybody,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to propose a new release candidate of Apache Drill, version
> > > > 1.3.0.  This is the second release candidate (rc1).  This addresses
> > some
> > > > issues identified in the first release candidate including some test
> > > > threading issues, Parquet dictionary read issue with binary values,
> > Joda
> > > > upgrade to avoid a concurrency bug and a couple other small things.
> > > >
> > > > The tarball artifacts are hosted at [2] and the maven artifacts are
> > > hosted
> > > > at [3]. This release candidate is based on commit
> > > > f17ebd2fbf2bf5ba201a635f5b6ec3615afe2305 located at [4].
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours ending at 10PM Pacific, November
> 9,
> > > 2015.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Jacques
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313820&version=12332946[2]
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.3.0.rc1/
> > > > [3]
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedrill-1014/
> > > > [4] https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/drill-1.3.0-rc1
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jacques Nadeau
> > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to