Sure!

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jason Altekruse <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The error you posted originally is from deserializing a storage plugin
> config, not the drill-override or drill-module files. That being said, we
> find the list of available storage plugins using classpath scanning.
>
> I don't know why the inclusion or exclusion of contents inside of a
> module.conf file would impact our scanning for storage plugins, but I
> believe this is the issue you are seeing. Somehow the package that contains
> the hbase plugin is being removed from the list of packages to scan when
> you add the empty file.
>
> Do you want to jump on slack to chat about this?
>
> - Jason
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:52 AM, rahul challapalli <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Julien,
> >
> > I have an empty drill-module.conf file in the udf jar file. Below are the
> > contents of my global drill-override.conf file
> >
> > drill.classpath.scanning.packages :
> ${?drill.classpath.scanning.packages} [
> > org.apache.drill.udfs ]
> > drill.exec: {
> >   cluster-id: "rahul_cluster_com-drillbits",
> >   zk.connect: "localhost:5181"
> > }
> >
> > With this, the drillbit fails to start with the error I posted in the
> first
> > email. May be I am getting the syntax wrong?
> >
> > The reason I am insisting an empty drill-module.conf file is because,
> udf's
> > developed prior to the "classpath scanning change" had an empty
> > drill-module.conf file and we used to override the udf package name in
> the
> > global conf file.
> >
> > - Rahul
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes I believe that should work:
> > > -  add an empty drill-module.conf in the root of the udf jar
> > > -  add the package to drill.classpath.scanning.packages in the drill
> conf
> > > (possibly using drill-override.conf)
> > >
> > > However if you are adding the drill-module.conf file to the jar, you
> > might
> > > as well add the package in it. (unless there's some other reason)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:28 AM, rahul challapalli <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just to be sure, If I have an empty drill-module.conf in the root of
> my
> > > udf
> > > > jar, then there is no way to add the package information to the
> global
> > > > drill-override.conf file?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You are correct:
> > > > > The jar containing the UDFs should have a drill-module.conf at the
> > root
> > > > > adding your package to the property
> drill.classpath.scanning.packages
> > > for
> > > > > scanning
> > > > > drill.classpath.scanning.packages :
> > > > ${?drill.classpath.scanning.packages} [
> > > > >         my.package.containing.my.udfs
> > > > >     ]
> > > > > Jars that don't contain a drill-module.conf will not get scanned.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:17 AM, rahul challapalli <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your reply Jason.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If we cannot override the global configuration file, then for
> > > existing
> > > > > > UDF's we have to re-compile them by modifying the
> drill-module.conf
> > > > file.
> > > > > > If so our UDF's are not backward compatible. Appreciate it if
> > someone
> > > > can
> > > > > > confirm this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Rahul
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Jason Altekruse <
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rahul,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The error message you are seeing is in reading a storage plugin
> > > > > > > configuration file. I am planning to fix these kinds of
> messages
> > to
> > > > > > > actually direct users at the file that is failing parsing. I
> have
> > > > seen
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > in the past when the classpath was incorrect and one of the
> > plugins
> > > > > (like
> > > > > > > Hbase) was not included.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Julien can confirm, but I think this might be intentional to
> have
> > > the
> > > > > > paths
> > > > > > > read out of the modules configuration rather than the global
> one
> > to
> > > > > save
> > > > > > > time when scanning the path (rather than scanning all of the
> jars
> > > for
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > paths given in the override file).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM, rahul challapalli <
> > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Before 1.2, my udfs project contained an empty
> > > drill-override.conf
> > > > > file
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > I used to update the drill-override.conf on all the drillbits
> > to
> > > > > > specify
> > > > > > > > the package of my UDF. This is no longer working for me. I
> > tried
> > > a
> > > > > few
> > > > > > > > things and below is how my drill-override.conf file looks now
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > drill.classpath.scanning.packages :
> > > > > > > ${?drill.classpath.scanning.packages} [
> > > > > > > > org.apache.drill.udfs ]
> > > > > > > > drill.exec: {
> > > > > > > >   cluster-id: "rahul_cluster_com-drillbits",
> > > > > > > >   zk.connect: "localhost:5181"
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > When I restart the drillbits, I get this strange error "
> Caused
> > > by:
> > > > > > > > com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: Could
> not
> > > > > resolve
> > > > > > > type
> > > > > > > > id 'hbase' into a subtype of [simple type, class
> > > > > > > > org.apache.drill.common.logical.StoragePluginConfig]"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If I moved the package information to the drill-module.conf
> in
> > my
> > > > > udf's
> > > > > > > > project, then things are working fine. However this requires
> > > > > > re-compiling
> > > > > > > > the udfs which is not desirable. Is there any other way
> around
> > > > this ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Rahul
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Julien
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Julien
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to