Github user jaltekruse commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/418#issuecomment-194049783
  
    Is there a way to ask Jackson to look at a POJO and give you what it 
considers to be the serializable fields? This isn't quite the right fix because 
it is valid to have private members in a class and only have some of the 
serialized and deserialized by Jackson based on gettters/setters. This would 
expose the non-serializable fields as options.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to