Github user jaltekruse commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/418#issuecomment-194049783
Is there a way to ask Jackson to look at a POJO and give you what it
considers to be the serializable fields? This isn't quite the right fix because
it is valid to have private members in a class and only have some of the
serialized and deserialized by Jackson based on gettters/setters. This would
expose the non-serializable fields as options.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---