Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/519#discussion_r67602350
  
    --- Diff: 
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/partition/PruneScanRule.java
 ---
    @@ -269,13 +283,54 @@ protected void doOnMatch(RelOptRuleCall call, Filter 
filterRel, Project projectR
             int recordCount = 0;
             int qualifiedCount = 0;
     
    -        // Inner loop: within each batch iterate over the 
PartitionLocations
    -        for(PartitionLocation part: partitions){
    -          if(!output.getAccessor().isNull(recordCount) && 
output.getAccessor().get(recordCount) == 1){
    -            newPartitions.add(part);
    -            qualifiedCount++;
    +        if (checkForSingle &&
    +            partitions.get(0).isCompositePartition() /* apply single 
partition check only for composite partitions */) {
    +          // Inner loop: within each batch iterate over the 
PartitionLocations
    +          for (PartitionLocation part : partitions) {
    +            assert part.isCompositePartition();
    +            if(!output.getAccessor().isNull(recordCount) && 
output.getAccessor().get(recordCount) == 1) {
    +              newPartitions.add(part);
    +              if (isSinglePartition) { // only need to do this if we are 
already single partition
    +                // compose the array of partition values for the 
directories that are referenced by filter:
    +                // e.g suppose the dir hierarchy is year/quarter/month and 
the query is:
    +                //     SELECT * FROM T WHERE dir0=2015 AND dir1 = 'Q1',
    +                // then for 2015/Q1/Feb, this will have ['2015', 'Q1', 
null]
    +                // Note that we are not using the PartitionLocation here 
but composing a different list because
    +                // we are only interested in the directory columns that 
are referenced in the filter condition. not
    +                // the SELECT list or other parts of the query.
    +                Pair<String[], Integer> p = 
composePartition(referencedDirsBitSet, partitionMap, vectors, recordCount);
    +                String[] parts = p.getLeft();
    +                int tmpIndex = p.getRight();
    +                if (spInfo == null) {
    +                  spInfo = parts;
    +                  maxIndex = tmpIndex;
    +                } else if (maxIndex != tmpIndex) {
    +                  isSinglePartition = false;
    +                  break;
    +                } else {
    +                  // we only want to compare until the maxIndex inclusive 
since subsequent values would be null
    +                  for (int j = 0; j <= maxIndex; j++) {
    +                    if (spInfo[j] == null // prefixes should be non-null
    --- End diff --
    
    If the query has for example WHERE dir2 = 'January' and does not have any 
condition on dir0 or dir1, then the spInfo array itself will be non-null but 
will have null elements in it:  [null, null, 'January']  and maxIndex = 2.  In 
this case, the single partition optimization should not be applied. I can add a 
comment here to explain. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to