Github user ppadma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/757
Thanks Sudheesh, Paul and Arina for the review. Original thought was it is
not worth the effort to keep operator table in sync with changes in dynamic
UDFs. This option is meant to be used for short running operational queries,
which most likely will not need dynamic UDF support (well, at least for now).
For long running analytic queries, this is not considered an issue.
However, I am looking into implementing Sudheesh's suggestion. I will
provide an update soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
