Github user paul-rogers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/907#discussion_r134035728
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/expr/fn/impl/StringFunctions.java
---
@@ -85,23 +183,118 @@ public void eval() {
@Output BitHolder out;
@Workspace java.util.regex.Matcher matcher;
@Workspace org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.CharSequenceWrapper
charSequenceWrapper;
+ @Workspace
org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.RegexpUtil.sqlPatternInfo patternInfo;
@Override
public void setup() {
- matcher =
java.util.regex.Pattern.compile(org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.RegexpUtil.sqlToRegexLike(
//
+ patternInfo =
org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.RegexpUtil.sqlToRegexLike(
org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.StringFunctionHelpers.toStringFromUTF8(pattern.start,
pattern.end, pattern.buffer),
-
org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.StringFunctionHelpers.toStringFromUTF8(escape.start,
escape.end, escape.buffer))).matcher("");
+
org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.StringFunctionHelpers.toStringFromUTF8(escape.start,
escape.end, escape.buffer));
charSequenceWrapper = new
org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.CharSequenceWrapper();
- matcher.reset(charSequenceWrapper);
+
+ // Use java regex and compile pattern only if it is not a simple
pattern.
+ if (patternInfo.getPatternType() ==
org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.RegexpUtil.sqlPatternType.NOT_SIMPLE) {
+ java.lang.String javaPatternString =
patternInfo.getJavaPatternString();
+ matcher =
java.util.regex.Pattern.compile(javaPatternString).matcher("");
+ matcher.reset(charSequenceWrapper);
+ }
}
@Override
public void eval() {
charSequenceWrapper.setBuffer(input.start, input.end, input.buffer);
// Reusing same charSequenceWrapper, no need to pass it in.
// This saves one method call since reset(CharSequence) calls reset()
- matcher.reset();
- out.value = matcher.matches()? 1:0;
+
+ // Not a simple case. Just use Java regex.
+ if (patternInfo.getPatternType() ==
org.apache.drill.exec.expr.fn.impl.RegexpUtil.sqlPatternType.NOT_SIMPLE) {
--- End diff --
We are doing a switch (actually, chain of ifs) per value. This is a tight
inner loop. Far better to simply generate an instance of the proper class and
call a single method to do the work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
