On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Paul Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
> The check style improvements are good, they will likely save developers > minutes per day. > > I would encourage us to consider other time savers. > > In normal development builds, Checkstyle issues should be warnings, not > errors. Developers waste many five-minute build cycles per day when we do a > quick & dirty prototype, only to wait for the build and have it fail due to > trivial check-style errors. Checkstyle is easily defeated when you run with an option similar to the way that unit tests are commonly defeated during development. I don't remember the exact option.
