Yeah, let's go ahead with this. I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am +1.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful. > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Drill devs > > > > If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to > move > > to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit > > without ever leaving github. > > > > Thanks > > > > Parth > > > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via > > > Google and mostly client related results came up. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: gitbox? > > > > > > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git > > services > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client. > > > > > > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to > > > any other Apache project as soon as possible. > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's > proven > > > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year. > > > > > > > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM > > > > To: dev <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: Re: gitbox? > > > > > > > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. > It > > > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache > > > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the > > > Apache master. > > > > > > > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run > > > the functional tests if doing a batch commit. > > > > > > > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of > > > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an > > > absentee. > > > >> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:[email protected]] > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM > > > >> To: dev <[email protected]> > > > >> Subject: Re: gitbox? > > > >> > > > >> Bumping this thread up. > > > >> > > > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we > would > > > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations! > > > >> > > > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion. > > > >> > > > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox. > > > >> > > > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process > > > document. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" ( > > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" ( > > > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, > > > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider > > > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give > > > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all > > > >>> the perks that Github > > > >> provides. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thank you, > > > >>> > > > >>> Vlad > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >
