arina-ielchiieva commented on a change in pull request #1818: DRILL-7200: 
Update Calcite to 1.19.0 / 1.20.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/1818#discussion_r299398641
 
 

 ##########
 File path: docs/dev/Calcite.md
 ##########
 @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ List of Jiras with Drill-specific commits:
 |[CALCITE-2018](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018)|Queries 
failed with AssertionError: rel has lower cost than best cost of subset|Pull 
request with the fix was created 
([PR-552](https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/552)), but 
[CALCITE-2166](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2166) which blocks 
it was found and is not resolved yet.|
 |[CALCITE-2087](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2087)|Add new 
method to ViewExpander interface to allow passing SchemaPlus.|Pull request into 
Apache Calcite was created, but it was declined. See conversation in Jira.|
 |[CALCITE-1178](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1178)|Allow 
SqlBetweenOperator to compare DATE and TIMESTAMP|SQL spec does not allow to 
compare datetime types if they have different `<primary datetime field>`s. 
Therefore Calcite community won’t accept these changes. Similar issues were 
reported in [CALCITE-2829](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2829) 
and in [CALCITE-2745](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2745).|
+|[CALCITE-3121](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3121)|VolcanoPlanner
 hangs due to removing ORDER BY from sub-query|Pull request was open to revert 
changes ([PR-1264](https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1264)) which remove 
ORDER BY clause; it wasn't merged, because aforementioned changes only unveiled 
the issue and no proper solution was proposed yet.|
 
 Review comment:
   ```suggestion
   
|[CALCITE-3121](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3121)|VolcanoPlanner
 hangs due to removing ORDER BY from sub-query|Pull request was open to revert 
changes ([PR-1264](https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1264)) which remove 
ORDER BY clause; it wasn't merged, because aforementioned changes only unveiled 
the issue and no proper solution is available yet.|
   ```

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to