vdiravka commented on pull request #2289: URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2289#issuecomment-916639316
> Calcite rules for adapters in most of the cases have parts of the logic related to the storage itself. My idea was to move out this logic from rules to "implementor", so we will have simple rules that could be reused, and adapters will provide only the "implementor" that will be responsible for checking whether the specific pushdown can be done and handling it. Does that makes sense to continue this conversation in Calcite dev list? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
