Ah, and I see now that you said as much already. So a collaboratively
edited document? Wiki pages containing a variety of independent views
might turn out something like this collection I suppose
https://wiki.c2.com/?GarbageCollection
which isn't bad IMHO.
On 2022/01/04 16:42, Ted Dunning wrote:
Threading is exactly what I would want to avoid.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, 3:58 AM James Turton <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all
GitHub Issues allow a conversation thread with rich formatting so I
propose that we use them for meaty topics like this. Please use the
"Feature Request" issue template for this purpose, and set the issue's
Project field to "Drill 2.0"[1], said project having recently been
created by Charles. I am busy transcribing the current discussion from
the mailing list and a GitHub PR to just such a new feature request at
https://github.com/apache/drill/issues/2421
<https://github.com/apache/drill/issues/2421>
James
[1] https://github.com/apache/drill/projects/1
<https://github.com/apache/drill/projects/1>
On 2022/01/04 09:49, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I wonder if there isn't a better place for this discussion?
>
> As you point out, there are many threads and many of the points
are rather
> contentious technically. That will make them even harder to
follow in an
> email thread.
>
> We could just use the wiki and format the text in the form of
questions
> with alternative positions.
>
> Or we could use an open google document with similar form.
>
> What's the preference here?
>
