jnturton commented on PR #2622: URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2622#issuecomment-1216187000
> Was there an agreement as to whether we should backport this to 1.20? Not yet. For my part I'm supportive of backporting because I don't like the idea of a classloader time bomb ticking away in 1.20. As an alternative, 1.20 could remain on the thin driver but start distributing its own build of it with the needed Avatica relocations applied. But, since the thick driver is going to be preferred by most (all?) users, that seems like a wasted effort to me and I vote to backport this. Does anyone have a different take? @luocooong @vvysotskyi -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@drill.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
