Yes, Rhino is something that we are very interested in as a general catch-all dynamic script - it should be fast. I think in SE6 there will also be a compiler API which will behandy.
The version 7 changes (INVOKEDYNAMIC) are where it gets really interesting for dynamic-ness. I can't wait. Unfortunately I have to. On 4/5/06, Steven Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am currently on a Sun Developer Days conference - they mentioned that > Java > SE 6 will have support for Rhino and 7 will have changes to the JVM just > to > cater for scripting support. > > Steve > > On 4/5/06, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The Rete visitor is still there. Dumper no longer exists as we have an > > integrated graphical rete viewer now, this is integrated into the IDE. > > > > 3.0 will only support Java. However we are using JCI and can support any > > compiler that works with JCI, that includes janino, jdt and groovy. I > > have no plans to support jython until they support JCI - their project > > looks like its stalling again. I do want to support javascript early in > > 3.1, so hopefully someone can make a JCI implementation for rhino soon. > > > > Mark > > > > 王在祥 wrote: > > > Drool2 have a interesting feature that we can use groovy, java, python > > etc > > > to coding the rule, but it looks the Drool3 put anything to the new > DRL > > > language. > > > > > > So what is the real case for Drools3 on support others? > > > > > > Also, it looks some useful tools such as org.drools.reteoo.Dumpermissed > > in > > > Drools3, and how many other change? Does Drools3 rewrite a new reteoo? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Steven Williams > > Supervising Consultant > > Object Consulting > Office: 8615 4500 Mob: 0439 898 668 Fax: 8615 4501 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.objectconsulting.com.au > > consulting | development | training | support > our experience makes the difference > >
