interesting stuff. leaps backward chaining is powerful.
peter
On 11/6/06, Peter Van Weert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.cs.kuleuven.be/~petervw/JCHR/
A small performance result you guys can relate to: I think manners128
runs in .5 second (*). One important contributing factor to this result
is undoubtedly that JCHR is compiled and executed using a Leaps-like
algorithm, rather than a RETE-based one, but JCHR is highly optimized in
several other ways as well.
CHeeRs,
Peter
Footnote:
(*) negation as absence -- necessary for manners -- is not yet a
documented feature, but there is a partial implementation, enough to run
manners
Peter Lin schreef:
> what's your rule engine? i'm curious
>
> peter
>
> On 11/6/06, *Peter Van Weert* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote:
>
> Yup, I did the same. I stripped HashMap down to its bare essence. I
> looked at the new JBoss hash-map code and I think the general idea is
> the same. Didn't give much performance gains though in my case (didn't
> even include it in my release yet). That's why I thought it had to be a
> combination of other factors.
> Oh well, not to worry, my performance is already more then good enough.
> Will look for other ways of improving it even more.
>
> Thanks for the replies!
>
> -Peter
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
