A slight correction: I was using v3.02. I had these issues about 6 months ago, 
and that was the latest version at the time. I have not tried with 3.04. Will 
have a go in the next few days to see if the new version changes anything.

Russell

---- Steven Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> We had issues with WebSphere and security turned on due to the drools
> generated class files not inheriting the permissions of the parent class
> (which led to Michael's question). Russell, if this was also your problem,
> Edson has fixed it in the 3.0.x stream.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> On 11/23/06, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > that might be related to how WAS implements J2 security. I had to use it
> > in the past with WAS 6 and it was far from simple or straight forward.
> >
> > peter
> >
> > On 11/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > Environment: WAS 5.11 (along with various service packs), drools 2.1,
> > > 2.5 and 3.04
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We had major issues with drools running with J2EE security turned on.
> > > With security turned off everything worked fine. The issue seemed to 
> > > similar
> > > for drools version 2.1, 2.5 and 3.04--basically at startup, when
> > > compiling the rules file, drools will blow up.
> > >
> > > We tried to get around it by changing the version of drools (particular
> > > as v3 was such a major change). It didn't help. We then tried serialising
> > > the rules separately and loading the serialised rules at start 
> > > up--different
> > > error, but no luck. We eventually realised that if we wrote the rules 
> > > using
> > > the statement eval() only (along with serialised rules), we could get 
> > > things
> > > to work.
> > >
> > > ie instead of
> > > account : AccountRequestItem (bankId != null)
> > >
> > > write:
> > > account : AccountRequestItem ()
> > >         eval ( account.getBankId() != null)
> > >
> > > Of course this isn't ideal, but at least it works.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Russell
> > >
> > > ---- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for late reply... we didn't do anything specific that I know
> > > of...
> > > > we had some memory leak issues with an older version of drools, but
> > > > everything got sorted out once we installed 3.0.4 (If I recall well it
> > > > was a 3.0RC that we were using) ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Other than that I do not recall having any specific issues on the
> > > > matter...Feel free to ask anyway (just send directly to my email so I
> > > do
> > > > not overlook it as this mail)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > > From: Michael Neale [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > Sent: 16 November 2006 15:54
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: [drools-dev] Anyone using websphere & drools
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and no issues with permission of accessing classes from generated code
> > > > or anything? did you have to flick any magic switches (now I am
> > > *really*
> > > > showing my ignorance of websphere).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       We are...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       Drools 3.0.4
> > > >       WS 5.1.1.1 & Portal 5.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       Brgrds,
> > > >       Matias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > >       From: Michael Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >       Sent: 15 November 2006 12:42
> > > >       To: Drools User List; [email protected]
> > > >       Subject: [drools-dev] Anyone using websphere & drools
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       Any version of drools?  (and let me know what version of WS and
> > > > rules).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       (if needs to be confidential, feel free to email me directly).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       Michael.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **** DISCLAIMER ****
> > > > http://www.belgacom.be/maildisclaimer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **** DISCLAIMER ****
> > > > http://www.belgacom.be/maildisclaimer
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > >
> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steven Williams
> 
> Supervising Consultant
> 
> Object Consulting
> Office: 8615 4500 Mob: 0439 898 668 Fax: 8615 4501
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.objectconsulting.com.au
> 
> consulting | development | training | support
> our experience makes the difference


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to