Tks. #1 - About overloading, I really do not see a problem, specially in this case, once the instance variable is out there and we can set/add it, and this is simple way to retrieve results from a processing in a StateLess session. #2 - Just an idea.......to the future.
<http://www.auster.com.br/> Solution <http://www.auster.com.br/> is our Business Marcos Tengelmann Relações Comerciais Auster Solutions do Brasil Avenida Ibirapuera 2120, cj 224 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: fax: mobile: Skype ID: 5052-8535 <http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?src=jj_signature&To=5052-8535&Email=marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5052-6711 9139.7983 <http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?src=jj_signature&To=9139.7983&Email=marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]> mtengelmann Want to always have my latest info? <https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=21475157331&v0=620798&k0=16779217&v1=620799&; k1=1001594622&src=client_sig_212_1_banner_join&invite=1> Want a signature like <http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_banner_sig> this? _____ From: Michael Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: terça-feira, 4 de setembro de 2007 00:48 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [drools-dev] RCP Plugin and StaetLess Hi Marcos. As for #1 - I don't know why stateless session doesn't have globals - I just noticed it. I will create a JIRA for this. It means more and more overloaded methods though. For #2, yes it has been thought of. When we have some more tools around modelling that aren't Pojo centric, that is certainly a worthwhile idea. Although the JDT tooling would mostly need to be there underneath. From my limited experience of RCPs - they aren't less bloated so much as features are not visual to the user. On 8/27/07, Marcos Tengelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, 2 points here: 1-Is there any reason to not have getGlobal method on a StateLessSession???? 2-What about na RCP Application for Drools Power Users? The objetive of this app would be very power users developing rules, with ful syntax and a good tool to write rules, but without all the eclipse weight and java.... ------------------------------------ Auster Solutions do Brasil Marcos Tengelmann Relações Comerciais [EMAIL PROTECTED] Avenida Ibirapuera 2120, cj 224 tel: 5052-8535 fax: 5052-6711 mobile: 9139.7983 Skype ID:mtengelmann ------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Mark Proctor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: domingo, 26 de agosto de 2007 14:00 To: [email protected] Subject: [drools-dev] 'from' improvements I find my self increasingly doing this order : Order(...) purcahse : Purchase(...) from order.items Where ... is for possible field constraints; so I figured some nice sugar for this would be purchase : Purchase(...) from Order(...).items So Order is a standard Pattern with standard field constraints, the difference it it has . operator at the end with the name of a field, or even possibly a method, which is what the 'from' uses as its data source. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
<<logo_pequeno.jpg>>
<<click_to_call.gif>>
