for https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5587
we deployed the changes in production manually for this and it works fine.

Prashant

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org> wrote:

> I raised backport PRs for everything on my list except for these three,
> since they had some (minor) conflicts and I was using a backport script
> that bails out if it sees any conflicts:
>
> - https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5504
> - https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5587
> - https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5374
>
> I will take a closer look at them later if nobody else gets to them.
>
> Nishant, I added https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5596 to the
> milestone.
>
> Prashant, I added https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5611 to the
> milestone.
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Prashant Deva <prashant.d...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > also for the list:
> >
> > - compact task throws exception #5611
> >
> > i dont have permission to add to gian's github milestone
> >
> > Prashant
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Gian Merlino <gianmerl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Here we go: https://github.com/druid-io/druid/milestone/26. Please add
> > > stuff if it makes sense (high importance / low risk bug fixes).
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Gian Merlino <gianmerl...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It looks like there's a lot of support for doing a 0.12.1… I'll make
> a
> > > > milestone in GH.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Slim Bouguerra <bs...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 especially there is some instability bugs.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> My feeling is that #3 and #2 are borderline, but #1 definitely
> > warrants
> > > a
> > > >> new release. Personally I have seen it occur at least a half dozen
> > > times,
> > > >> and I had been thinking about proposing a Druid 0.12.1 release, so
> I'm
> > > >> glad
> > > >> you brought it up.
> > > >>
> > > >> If we do 0.12.1, it would be another non-ASF release (we haven't got
> > the
> > > >> ASF process set up yet, and are not likely to have it set up in
> time)
> > so
> > > >> we
> > > >> should notify the incubator folks about it.
> > > >>
> > > >> I would also consider including these fixes in 0.12.1:
> > > >>
> > > >> - DoublesSketchModule: Fix serde for DoublesSketchMergeAggregatorFa
> > > ctory.
> > > >> (#5587)
> > > >> - ArrayAggregation: Use long to avoid overflow (#5544)
> > > >> - Respect forceHashAggregation in queryContext (#5533)
> > > >> - Fix indexTask to respect forceExtendableShardSpecs (#5509)
> > > >> - Add overlord unsecured paths to coordinator when using combined
> > > service
> > > >> (#5579)
> > > >> - Fix SQLMetadataSegmentManager to allow succesive start and stop
> > > (#5554)
> > > >> - Fix supervisor tombstone auth handling (#5504)
> > > >> - Authorize supervisor history instead of current active supervisors
> > for
> > > >> supervisor history API (#5501)
> > > >> - Fix round robining in router. (#5500)
> > > >> - SegmentMetadataQuery: Fix default interval handling. (#5489)
> > > >> - Log exceptions thrown before persist() for indexing tasks (#5374)
> > > >> - More memory limiting for HttpPostEmitter (#5300)
> > > >> - pass configuration from context into JobConf for determining
> > > >> DatasourceInputFormat splits (#5408)
> > > >> - Lookups: Inherit "injective" from registered lookups, improve
> docs.
> > > >> (#5316)
> > > >> - SQL: Throttle metadata refreshes when they fail. (#5328)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Gian Merlino <g...@imply.io>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I think this conversation is worth having. I have cross posted this
> to
> > > >> dev@druid.apache.org and will reply there. Since we're trying to
> > > migrate
> > > >> the dev list, please cross post any dev messages there, or even only
> > > post
> > > >> to that list.
> > > >>
> > > >> Gian
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Prashant Deva <
> > prashant.d...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Current 0.12.0 release has some major issues:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>   1. Coordinator loses leadership
> > > >>   https://github.com/druid-io/druid/issues/5561
> > > >>
> > > >>   2. Newly introduced Quantiles sketch is broken
> > > >>   https://github.com/druid-io/druid/issues/5575
> > > >>
> > > >>   3. Coordinator+overlord web console broken
> > > >>   https://github.com/druid-io/druid/issues/5559
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. is especially very important. Without a coordinator, druid stops
> > > >> functioning.
> > > >> With bug 5561, it is impossible to use druid for long periods since
> > > >> coordinator eventually does lose leadership and the whole process
> > needs
> > > to
> > > >> be restarted for it to come back.
> > > >>
> > > >> *Why not wait till 0.13.0?*
> > > >>
> > > >> A lot of companies like to update one version at a time and may not
> > want
> > > >> to jump directly to 0.13.0.
> > > >> Those companies will hit a bad surprise due to bug 5561 essentially
> > > >> rendering the cluster useless in production.
> > > >> Also quantiles being the new feature and broken does not look good
> > > either.
> > > >>
> > > >> 0.12.0 is a 'release', not an RC, thus marking it good for
> production,
> > > >> but the bugs listed above prevent it from being used as such.
> > > >> I highly recommend 0.12.1 release, thus marking the right version to
> > > >> upgrade to from 0.11.0
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > >> "Druid Development" group.
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send
> > > an
> > > >> email to druid-development+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to druid-development@
> > googlegroups.com
> > > .
> > > >> To view this discussion on the web visit
> > https://groups.google.com/d/ms
> > > >> gid/druid-development/165b491e-3ec2-4744-a228-d1270c9d283a%4
> > > >> 0googlegroups.com
> > > >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/druid-development/
> > > >> 165b491e-3ec2-4744-a228-d1270c9d283a%40googlegroups.
> > > >> com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > >> "Druid Development" group.
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send
> > > an
> > > >> email to druid-development+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to druid-development@
> > googlegroups.com
> > > .
> > > >> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/
> > > >> msgid/druid-development/CACZNdYDbTjn%2BVZfnK-zuugw_
> > > >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/druid-development/
> > > CACZNdYDbTjn%2BVZfnK-zuugw_>
> > > >> E1efUNu2F4G%2BJTZJa0h7J-iK3w%40mail.gmail.com
> > > >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/druid-development/
> > > >> CACZNdYDbTjn%2BVZfnK-zuugw_E1efUNu2F4G%2BJTZJa0h7J-iK3w%
> > > >> 40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> > > >> .
> > > >>
> > > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to