Hi Vote thread for druid 29.0.1 is up. https://lists.apache.org/thread/6syof9fmnb7vbyjrpowrt7s73rh2bqy4
Thanks Karan On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:10 AM Vadim Ogievetsky <vogievet...@apache.org> wrote: > That sounds great to me. Thank you +1 > > On 2024/02/20 18:58:35 Laksh Singla wrote: > > Since the artifacts were already out at the time of the Vad's vote, I > will > > be going ahead with the release of Druid 29.0.0. However, I do echo with > > the comments mentioned in the mail, therefore we can take the following > > steps to prevent misfortune for the unexpecting users: > > > > For the current Druid 29.0.0 release: > > 1. The docs (update, release, and general docs) will be updated with the > > possible pitfalls arising out of console injecting the "arrayIngestMode" > > automatically, and persisting it for the given tab. > > > > Further, we can have a patch release, 29.0.1, with the following patches > > mentioned in the Vad's mail, that would have been a part of RC2, had the > > vote not passed through at the time: > > 1. https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15927 > > 2. https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15920 > > > > This will address the concerns regarding the 29.0.0 release, and also > give > > enough time for the PRs to get reviewed without being hastened by the > > release timeline. I'll volunteer to be the release manager for the same. > > Thoughts? > > > > Regards > > Laksh > > > > > > > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 10:50, Abhishek Agarwal <abhis...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Vad, The vote was closed by Laksh, given that 72 hours had passed and > > > artifacts had been released. Given we had the three binding +1s, we can > > > proceed as usual. I suggest that we call out the caveat clearly in the > > > release notes section. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:53 PM Vadim Ogievetsky < > vogievet...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you for all the work getting this release to this point. As the > > > > author of https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15588 I regretfully > vote > > > > -1 on this release. To echo Gian's point I think the chance of some > user > > > > injuring a production Datasource with an innocent query pasted into > the > > > > wrong web console tab is just too large. The fact that the > > > > "arrayIngestMode" setting itself is not new in this release is > immaterial > > > > to my consideration as I am more worried about "what might happen by > > > > accident" than "what is technically possible to mess up". > > > > > > > > I have made a PR (https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15927) that > > > > implements Gian's suggestion of: Making it obvious in the web console > > > > whether a tab is in "arrayIngestMode: array" or "arrayIngestMode: > mvd" or > > > > "server default". Furthermore this PR also minimizes the use of > > > > "arrayIngestMode: array" to only when needed while still generating > the > > > > "correct" form of the SQL queries at all times. If this PR was > merged and > > > > back-ported I would change my vote to +1. > > > > > > > > I think that Gian's validation PR ( > > > > https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15920) is an even better > solution, > > > > as it would protect API usage and usage via other frontends also. > > > Obviously > > > > we could merge both. > > > > > > > > Another idea that would solve this issue would be have the ability > to set > > > > context flags via SQL perhaps with a PARAMETER keyword. If this was > > > > possible the console could exclusively use that for setting query > context > > > > parameters on generated queries. > > > > > > > > Vadim > > > > > > > > On 2024/02/17 02:52:38 Gian Merlino wrote: > > > > > Here's a patch with the validation idea: > > > > https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15920 > > > > > > > > > > It adds validation for the most problematic case (mixing strings > and > > > > arrays), provides a way to override the validation, and makes the > warning > > > > log on the controller task when arrayIngestMode is 'mvd' more > friendly > > > and > > > > explanatory. > > > > > > > > > > Depending on which direction you're going in, the errors look like > > > > either: > > > > > > > > > > Cannot write into field[flags] using type[VARCHAR ARRAY] and > > > > arrayIngestMode[mvd], since the existing type is[VARCHAR ARRAY]. Try > > > > setting arrayIngestMode to[array] to retain the SQL type[VARCHAR > ARRAY] > > > > > > > > > > Or: > > > > > > > > > > Cannot write into field[flags] using type[VARCHAR ARRAY] and > > > > arrayIngestMode[array], since the existing type is[VARCHAR]. Try > wrapping > > > > this field using ARRAY_TO_MV(...) AS "flags" > > > > > > > > > > The "try" language pushes people towards the behavior we'd like > for the > > > > future: using arrayIngestMode[array] and wrapping MVDs in > ARRAY_TO_MV. > > > > > > > > > > I'm changing my vote to a plain 0, given that _most_ of the changes > > > > related to arrayIngestMode went out in Druid 28. However I do think > it > > > > would be nice to get a patch like this in, given that the Druid 29 > web > > > > console is pushing more people to change their arrayIngestMode. > > > > > > > > > > Gian > > > > > > > > > > On 2024/02/16 22:24:23 Gian Merlino wrote: > > > > > > I just learned that arrayIngestMode is not actually new, just > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15588 is. However this will > > > > still make > > > > > > it more likely that people accidentally break their tables, so I > am > > > > still > > > > > > -0. Just, slightly less so. I still think it would be a good > idea, > > > for > > > > > > Druid 29, to add string-to-array type validation to Druid 29's > > > INSERT / > > > > > > REPLACE handling to compensate for the new web console support > for > > > > > > arrayIngestMode, and the UI changes to push people towards > setting it > > > > to > > > > > > "array". > > > > > > > > > > > > I could be convinced that it's ok to do that in a 29.0.1. I don't > > > > think it > > > > > > should wait for 30, given the impact that can happen if people > end up > > > > with > > > > > > mixed types without planning for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:16 PM Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for managing this release! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My vote is -0, let me explain why. I am concerned about > usability > > > > issues > > > > > > > with the new arrayIngestMode feature. There are various issues > when > > > > mixing > > > > > > > MVD strings and string arrays in the same column: as soon as > arrays > > > > show up > > > > > > > in a column, various "classic MVD-style" queries will fail at > > > > validation or > > > > > > > at runtime. I believe that the new feature, and especially the > > > > changes to > > > > > > > the web console in https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15588, > > > will > > > > make > > > > > > > it more likely that people will do this by accident and > experience > > > > > > > brokenness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When this occurs, there is not an easy way to fix it; data > needs to > > > > be > > > > > > > reingested or queries need to be adjusted. I believe that in > some > > > > cases, > > > > > > > queries can't be adjusted without suffering from performance > loss. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is something that could happen even before Druid 29, if > you > > > did > > > > a > > > > > > > Kafka ingest with auto types or useSchemaDiscovery, followed > by a > > > SQL > > > > > > > REPLACE from that table into itself. In that case, arrays > written > > > by > > > > Kafka > > > > > > > ingest would get rewritten as MVDs. But with this Druid 29 RC, > > > there > > > > are > > > > > > > additional pathways created that enable people to get into this > > > > problematic > > > > > > > scenario with increased likelihood. I suggest we make some > > > > adjustments that > > > > > > > prevent it, such as: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Validating that SQL INSERT and SQL REPLACE do not insert an > array > > > > type > > > > > > > into a column that previously contained strings, or vice versa. > > > > > > > - Making it obvious in the web console whether a tab is in > > > > > > > "arrayIngestMode: array" or "arrayIngestMode: mvd" or "server > > > > default". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for considering this viewpoint. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 4:34 AM Laksh Singla < > > > lakshsin...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi all, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I have created a build for Apache Druid 29.0.0, release > > > > > > >> candidate 1. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thanks to everyone who has helped contribute to the release! > You > > > > can read > > > > > > >> the proposed release notes here: > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/druid/issues/15896 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as > > > > > > >> druid-29.0.0-rc1 (869bd3978f0c835ef8eb7c1f25c468e23472a81b), > > > > > > >> available here: > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/druid/tree/druid-29.0.0-rc1 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> The artifacts to be voted on are located here: > > > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/druid/29.0.0-rc1/ > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> A staged Maven repository is available for review at: > > > > > > >> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedruid-1061/ > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Staged druid.apache.org website documentation is available > here: > > > > > > >> https://druid.staged.apache.org/docs/29.0.0/design/ > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> A Docker image containing the binary of the release candidate > can > > > be > > > > > > >> retrieved via: > > > > > > >> docker pull apache/druid:29.0.0-rc1 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> artifact checksums > > > > > > >> src: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 1948fab4500f3571591f887a638631b6a05f040b88b35004406ca852e16884e5d2269a74e8d07c79c477d8b02a2489efec85776f8ef46f4e8defedce4efb9931 > > > > > > >> bin: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > f2a11ddc71b59a648d01d7c220a6fae527c34d702d4f1e7aed954803a3576543c4cd7149f34e8948eccf89240435f09a8512db83b46991ac6e354eeba8cbada4 > > > > > > >> docker: > > > > 2bddcf692f2137dc4094908b63d2043423fca895ba0f479f0db34ec8016c4472 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > > > > >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lakshsingla.asc > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> This key and the key of other committers can also be found in > the > > > > > > >> project's > > > > > > >> KEYS file here: > > > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/druid/KEYS > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> (If you are a committer, please feel free to add your own key > to > > > > that file > > > > > > >> by following the instructions in the file's header.) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Verify checksums: > > > > > > >> diff <(shasum -a512 apache-druid-29.0.0-src.tar.gz | \ > > > > > > >> cut -d ' ' -f1) \ > > > > > > >> <(cat apache-druid-29.0.0-src.tar.gz.sha512 ; echo) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> diff <(shasum -a512 apache-druid-29.0.0-bin.tar.gz | \ > > > > > > >> cut -d ' ' -f1) \ > > > > > > >> <(cat apache-druid-29.0.0-bin.tar.gz.sha512 ; echo) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Verify signatures: > > > > > > >> gpg --verify apache-druid-29.0.0-src.tar.gz.asc \ > > > > > > >> apache-druid-29.0.0-src.tar.gz > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> gpg --verify apache-druid-29.0.0-bin.tar.gz.asc \ > > > > > > >> apache-druid-29.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Please review the proposed artifacts and vote. Note that > Apache > > > has > > > > > > >> specific requirements that must be met before +1 binding > votes can > > > > be cast > > > > > > >> by PMC members. Please refer to the policy at > > > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#policy for > more > > > > details. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> As part of the validation process, the release artifacts can > be > > > > generated > > > > > > >> from source by running: > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -Papache-release,dist -Dgpg.skip > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> The RAT license check can be run from source by: > > > > > > >> mvn apache-rat:check -Prat > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. The vote will > pass > > > if > > > > a > > > > > > >> majority of at least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Druid 29.0.0 > > > > > > >> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the > > > release > > > > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@druid.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@druid.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@druid.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@druid.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@druid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@druid.apache.org > > -- Thanks Karan
