Hi Xin,

Then we need to rollback what we made in hessian-lite module and keep the 
original license/author info as is. As Justin suggested, pls. also cross check 


> On 14 Mar 2018, at 5:47 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>> It seems to be a combination of a BSD license and Apache which is slightly 
>> confusing. IMO nothing needs to go in NOTICE but we probably need to look 
>> into it in a little more detail.
> Which is what The Apache 1.1 license is (i.e. a modified BSD one) it’s been a 
> while since I’ve looked at the text from ALv1.1. As far as a release goes IMO 
> the LICENSE txt needs to go in (or be pointed at) in LICENSE, [1] nothing 
> should be added to NOTICE [2] (as the text is included in LICENSE) and the 
> headers should be left on the existing code as is.
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices

Reply via email to