I think the reason Andrea gave is valid, we should consider this. On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:30 PM Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > thank you for your response. > > > Thanks for your reporting Andrea. > > > > This causes Maven not to consider Bom a sub module of Dubbo > > > > > > I think the '<module>bom</module>' in dubbo root pom.xml will make Dubbo > > consider Bom as a sub module. > > > > > Well that's right but if you don't set dubbo root pom.xml as parent you > have some annoying side effects. For example, let's say you want to build a > new release and to do so you use Maven version plugin like this: > > mvn versions:set -DnewVersion="2.6.4" > > If you run the command above on Dubbo root folder all submodules version > will be updated except bom module, because it is not a direct child of root > pom. Anyway, I don't think there is any drawback if we change bom parent to > Dubbo root. Am I right? > > > > > Best regards, > > Jun > > > > On 19 Aug 2018, at 00:44, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I see that Dubbo Bom module has the Apache Foundation POM as parent and > > not dubbo-parent, which also has Apache Foundation POM as parent. This > > causes Maven not to consider Bom a sub module of Dubbo. It's not a big > > issue but I think Bom should have dubbo-parent as parent like all the > other > > sub modules. > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > > > > > > -- > Andrea Del Bene. > Apache Wicket committer. >
