TRUE means strictly matching FALSE means the most matching
To me, if users can trun it on/off, default value is not a big issue. At 2018-08-27 13:14:22, "Ian Luo" <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: >I quote Kirito Moe's questions here for discussion convenience: > >Need more discussion > > 1. If a tag request can not find any application of the same tag，should > it use other application of different tag (NOTICE : different tag is not > the default application with grey block) > 2. If a normal request can not find normal application，should it use any > tag application?(in my opinion，normal request should not reach the tag > application，also the current version). > 3. A forceTag flag can be considered to decided the behavior of > downgrade. forceTag=true means all tag requests must strictly match the > application's tag；forceTag=false means tag requests will prefer the > application of the same tag，if there is no corresponding application， > downgrade to other application，ignore the tag. > 4. On the basis of 3. what is default value of foreTag TRUE or FALSE. > > >Here below are my answers: > >For points 1 and 2, I think we should not allow the traffic be routed to >the server instance on which a different tag is specified since it usually >means different service implementation, but at the same time, I believe it >is reasonable to route the traffic to the instance with has no tag >specified at all, because no-tag-service usually means main stream service >which is public to all clients. In summary, I believe the behavior should >looks like this: > >1. branch request -> main stream service (v) >2. branch1 request -> branch2 service (x) >3. branch1 request -> branch1 service (v) > >For the point 3, it looks like Kirito wants to add one flag in order to >customize the behavior when needed, which I think it's a good thoughts, but >the default value should reflect to the default behavior, as I describe >above, which is TRUE. > >This is my two cents. > >Regards, >-Ian. > > >On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 2:12 AM 徐靖峰 <kirito....@foxmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> >> >> Forgive me for not being able to use mail list skillfully，some picture and >> link were lost in last email, >> >> >> more details about the issue can refer >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/2341
