Now the junit5 source code is removed， thank you all. Ian Luo <[email protected]> 于2019年1月10日周四 下午5:19写道：
> I think it is fine if we don't include the source code from softwares > fallen into "Category B”. In this particular case, let's simply use junit > 5.4.0.M1 directly to avoid it. > > Regards, > -Ian. > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:44 PM Xin Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sorry I mean “convenience binary” i.e. a binary made fro a source > > package for the convenience of users who don’t want to compile the source > > code. > > > > Does it mean that if I use the jar generated from the source code of > EPL2， > > also need to be placed in the LICENSE file? > > > > Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> 于2019年1月10日周四 下午4:34写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can you elaborate why you need the codes in 5.4.0? > > > Maybe we can find a way to work it around. > > > If not, I think option 1 and option 2 looks both ok to me. > > > If I have to choose, I choose option 1 because this is a test > > > dependency, it should not have too much impact to the code quality. > > > If choose option 2 and have to wait 2 month, maybe there will be lots > > > of refactoring work like resolving conflicts. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:09 PM Xin Wang <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > If so , I think there are two methds: > > > > 1. Use jupiter version5.4.0-M1 [1]: but it is a milestone version, > > not > > > a > > > > release version > > > > 2. Use jupiter version5.4.0: the release date is uncertain （maybe > > need > > > > two monthes） > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/releases/tag/r5.4.0-M1 > > > > > > > > Justin Mclean <[email protected]> 于2019年1月10日周四 下午3:50写道： > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > I have a question :I ues junit-jupiter5.3.2, but for some test > > > cases, I > > > > > > copied some source code from junit 5.4.0.M1 , the files are as > > > follow : > > > > > > org.junit.jupiter.api.support.io.TempDirectory.java > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.junit.jupiter.api.MethodDescriptororg.junit.jupiter.api.TestMethodOrderorg.junit.jupiter.api.Orderorg.junit.jupiter.api.MethodOrdererorg.junit.jupiter.api.MethodOrdererContextorg.junit.jupiter.api.MethodDescriptor > > > > > > > > > > > > the license is Eclipse Public License - v 2.0 > > > > > > Do I need to mark it in the LICENSE file? > > > > > > > > > > Sorry EPL is considered "Category B” [1] and isn’t fully > compatible > > > with > > > > > ALv2 can’t be included in a source release. Is there another way of > > > doing > > > > > this? > > > > > > > > > > if it was the connivance binary then yes you would need to put it > in > > > the > > > > > LICENSE. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards！ > > > Huxing > > > > > >
