Hi,

All the preparation seems going well.
I have successfully uploaded 2.7.0 to staging repo, and upload the
release candidate to svn.
I saw that the release note is still in Chinese.

Jun, could you please summarize an English version of the release note.
I will send the vote email once it is done.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:48 PM victory <shenglic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have check the file , it is the same as pull request #3263.
>
>
> Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org> 于2019年1月17日周四 下午5:34写道:
>
> > Hi Victory,
> >
> > I've mistakenly reverted your recent pull request[1].
> > Luckily I have restored it via the commit email message.
> > I've push it to 2.7.0-release branch already.
> > Would you please help to check it?
> >
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3263
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:08 PM victory <shenglic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have review the code and it work well in
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-samples/tree/samples-for-2.7.0-SNAPSHOT/dubbo-samples-configcenter/dubbo-samples-configcenter-apollo
> > >
> > > I have merged this pull request into 2.7.0-release.
> > >
> > > Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org> 于2019年1月17日周四 下午2:59写道:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This looks like a blocking issue, I've already tagged 2.7.0, I will
> > > > wait for it and re-do the tagging.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM jun liu <ken.lj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am seeing that all the issue has been cleaned for the 2.7.0
> > > > milestone.
> > > > > > It looks like all the things have been settled, I am planning to
> > tag
> > > > > > the 2.7.0 release today.
> > > > >
> > > > > One more issue to be solved before vote.
> > > > > Thanks to the suggestions from the Apollo[1] community, I submitted a
> > > > PR[2] to polish the Apollo extension. Please help to review.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. https://github.com/ctripcorp/apollo
> > > > > 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3263
> > > > >
> > > > > Jun
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 17, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am seeing that all the issue has been cleaned for the 2.7.0
> > > > milestone.
> > > > > > It looks like all the things have been settled, I am planning to
> > tag
> > > > > > the 2.7.0 release today.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dubbo-ops and dubbo-spring-boot-project should be released after
> > Dubbo
> > > > > > 2.7.0 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:02 PM jun liu <ken.lj...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:
> > > > ken.lj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> There is no need to shade gson into dubbo.jar, just need depency
> > gson
> > > > > >>> library.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I have fixed it .
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246> <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246>>
> > > > > >> Agree.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Well done,  merged.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Jun
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> On Jan 16, 2019, at 4:15 PM, victory <shenglic...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> There is no need to shade gson into dubbo.jar, just need depency
> > gson
> > > > > >>> library.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I have fixed it .
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Ian Luo <ian....@gmail.com> 于2019年1月16日周三 下午2:34写道:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> We should not shade gson binaries into dubbo all in one jar
> > file,
> > > > even
> > > > > >>>> though there's no license issue. It is simply we should not do
> > this,
> > > > > >>>> instead, we should make sure dubbo all in one jar should have a
> > > > transitive
> > > > > >>>> dependency to gson library.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I noticed it's caused
> > > > by'<include>com.google.code.gson:gson</include>' in
> > > > > >>>> dubbo-all/pom.xml. We should fix it.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>> -Ian.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:16 PM jun liu <ken.lj...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I noticed that a third-party source code ‘com.google <
> > > > http://com.google/
> > > > > >>>>> .gson.*’
> > > > > >>>>> has been compiled into the convenient maven binary jar of
> > 2.7.0 -
> > > > > >>>>> dubbo-2.7.0.jar :
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> .
> > > > > >>>>> ├── META-INF
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── DEPENDENCIES
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── LICENSE
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── MANIFEST.MF
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── NOTICE
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── assembly
> > > > > >>>>> │   │   └── bin
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── compat
> > > > > >>>>> │   │   └── dubbo.xsd
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── dubbo
> > > > > >>>>> │   │   └── internal
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── dubbo.xsd
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── maven
> > > > > >>>>> │   │   ├── com.alibaba
> > > > > >>>>> │   │   ├── com.google.code.gson
> > > > > >>>>> │   │   └── org.apache.dubbo
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── spring.handlers
> > > > > >>>>> │   └── spring.schemas
> > > > > >>>>> ├── com
> > > > > >>>>> │   ├── alibaba
> > > > > >>>>> │   │   ├── com
> > > > > >>>>> │   │   └── dubbo
> > > > > >>>>> │   └── google
> > > > > >>>>> │       └── gson
> > > > > >>>>> └── org
> > > > > >>>>>   └── apache
> > > > > >>>>>       └── dubbo
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Since this binary jar (dubbo-2.7.0.jar) will be included in the
> > > > Apache
> > > > > >>>>> Binary Release, should we update the LICENSE or NOTICE file in
> > the
> > > > Binary
> > > > > >>>>> Release to announce the existence of these binary files?
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> BTW, ‘com.google <http://com.google/>.gson’ is declared to be
> > unde
> > > > > >>>> Apache
> > > > > >>>>> License 2.0.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> You can directly download the latest SNAPSHOT release of
> > > > 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > >>>> in
> > > > > >>>>> here[1] and unzip and check the contents to better understand
> > what
> > > > I am
> > > > > >>>>> trying to describe here.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> 1.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/dubbo/dubbo/2.7.0-SNAPSHOT/
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Jun
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Hi Jun,
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Could you summarize the current status of the 2.7-release
> > branch?
> > > > > >>>>>> I see there are still several enhancement on this branch.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> As this is the first time to prepare for a release for me, I
> > am
> > > > trying
> > > > > >>>>>> to walk through the release steps[1].
> > > > > >>>>>> I might try to deploy snapshot to maven repository.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Once we feel it is ready to do the release, I will start the
> > > > formal
> > > > > >>>>>> release process.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> [1]
> > > > http://dubbo.apache.org/en-us/blog/prepare-an-apache-release.html
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>> Best Regards!
> > > > > >>>>>> Huxing
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:48 PM jun liu <ken.lj...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Nice work!
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> I think we should let the community to participate more in
> > the
> > > > > >>>> release
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> process, for example,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1. check out a release branch called 2.7.0-release
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 2. encourage people to check it out, test it and report if
> > > > there is
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> any regressions, bugs or issues.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 3. while we are doing the test, we can start going through
> > the
> > > > ASF
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> release process locally, once we think it is ready to
> > start a
> > > > formal
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> release note, it can be done very quickly.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> By the way, we need decide the release manager of 2.7.0
> > > > release. Is
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> there anyone who volunteer to do that?
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Sorry, I missed this mail.
> > > > > >>>>>>> * 2.7.0-release has been created
> > > > > >>>>>>> * we've froze the codebase, test is underway.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> I'd like to be the release manager if no one is claiming it.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Great, I can help you with the source/binary packaging and
> > > > tagging
> > > > > >>>>> things.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Jun
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Jan 5, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Huxing Zhang <
> > hux...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 10:45 AM Huxing Zhang <
> > > > hux...@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Nice work!
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> I think we should let the community to participate more in
> > the
> > > > > >>>> release
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> process, for example,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1. check out a release branch called 2.7.0-release
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 2. encourage people to check it out, test it and report if
> > > > there is
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> any regressions, bugs or issues.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 3. while we are doing the test, we can start going through
> > the
> > > > ASF
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> release process locally, once we think it is ready to
> > start a
> > > > formal
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> release note, it can be done very quickly.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> By the way, we need decide the release manager of 2.7.0
> > > > release. Is
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> there anyone who volunteer to do that?
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> I'd like to be the release manager if no one is claiming it.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:53 PM jun liu <
> > ken.lj...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, All
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I am writing this mail to
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Keep you refreshed of the latest status about v2.7.0.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Call for efforts on code review and tests
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Discuss possible release schedules of v2.7.0.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> About v2.7, it’s going to be a milestone version, in which
> > > > will
> > > > > >>>> make
> > > > > >>>>> some significant changes. Most importantly, we will complete
> > all IP
> > > > > >>>>> Clearance related works. Technically speaking, it’s from this
> > > > version on
> > > > > >>>>> that a Dubbo release starts fully follows the Apache rules
> > > > (lawfully),
> > > > > >>>>> totally independent from any other third-party organizations or
> > > > > >>>> companies.
> > > > > >>>>> Secondly, this version will include many new features that have
> > > > received
> > > > > >>>>> wide attention from the community, by supporting these
> > features,
> > > > we can
> > > > > >>>>> better resolve the community’s long accumulated demands. Last
> > but
> > > > not
> > > > > >>>>> least, we have made some architectural changes in this version,
> > > > made
> > > > > >>>> Dubbo
> > > > > >>>>> closer to the micro-service architecture, take the newly
> > introduced
> > > > > >>>>> configuration center as an example, it can work both as the
> > center
> > > > of
> > > > > >>>>> Externalized Configuration at startup and as the center of
> > service
> > > > > >>>>> management configurations at runtime.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> To summarize, the contents already included in the
> > CodeBase
> > > > are:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Config Center: Zookeeper, Apollo, Nacos
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Externalized Configuration
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Service governance enhancement: dynamic configuration &
> > > > routing
> > > > > >>>>> rule
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Repackage to 'org.apache.dubbo'
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Java 8 support
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Async programming support
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Most of the candidates listed above are in the proposal
> > list
> > > > that
> > > > > >>>> we
> > > > > >>>>> have discussed in some threads before. For a more detailed
> > > > description of
> > > > > >>>>> these features or how they are realized, you can refer to the
> > draft
> > > > > >>>>> development documentations within this link[1]
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks to the efforts from the community (especially
> > thank to
> > > > Ian,
> > > > > >>>>> CVictory and Minxuan), most of the development work has been
> > > > completed
> > > > > >>>> and
> > > > > >>>>> a round of code review and regression test based on some basic
> > use
> > > > cases
> > > > > >>>>> have been completed[2].
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Now I think it's time to prepare the formal release. One
> > most
> > > > > >>>>> important thing I think we should pay attention to is
> > stability. We
> > > > > >>>> should
> > > > > >>>>> guarantee it's stable enough before release, so we may need to
> > put
> > > > more
> > > > > >>>>> effort into code review and functional testing. Based on my
> > > > understanding
> > > > > >>>>> of the CodeBase, such tests may at least continue to last for
> > > > about 1
> > > > > >>>> week,
> > > > > >>>>> during this period we may need to `freeze the code`, which
> > means
> > > > only
> > > > > >>>>> optimization and bugfix will be allowed. After that, we can
> > > > continue to
> > > > > >>>>> evaluate when to start the formal vote process.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/2919
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> 2.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-samples/tree/samples-for-2.7.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Jun
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Best Regards!
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Huxing
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Best Regards!
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Huxing
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>> Best Regards!
> > > > > >>>>>> Huxing
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Best Regard!
> > > > > >>> cvitory
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > > Huxing
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards!
> > > > Huxing
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best Regard!
> > > cvitory
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards!
> > Huxing
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regard!
> cvitory



-- 
Best Regards!
Huxing

Reply via email to