Hi,

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:21 AM jun liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I am merging back the 2.7.0-release branch to master to avoid having too many 
> conflicts if do it too late, then we may need to constantly do the merge with 
> every few days before vote is done.

Be careful that I just forcely updated 2.7.0-release, because I have
to revert the version bump commits by maven release plugin.
>
> Jun
>
> > On Jan 18, 2019, at 2:28 PM, Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I still found some inconsistency between the source release and the
> > Git tag dubbo-2.7.0:
> >
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release: all
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release: bom
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release: dependencies-bom
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release: distribution
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release: dubbo-bootstrap
> > Only in 
> > apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release/dubbo-config/dubbo-config-spring/src/test/resources:
> > work
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release/dubbo-demo:
> > dubbo-demo-consumer
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release/dubbo-demo:
> > dubbo-demo-provider
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release/dubbo-metrics:
> > dubbo-metrics-default
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release/dubbo-test:
> > dubbo-test-benchmark
> > Only in apache-dubbo-incubating-2.7.0-source-release/dubbo-test:
> > dubbo-test-examples
> >
> > It is possibly due to my local environment, I am going to do it again
> > with clean checkout of Dubbo 2.7.0-release branch.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:25 AM Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I found that there is a file test.patch in source release, which was
> >> the patch I used to restore the commit I reverted yesterday.
> >> This is not what we want, I am going to remove this file and re-tagging 
> >> 2.7.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:47 AM Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:08 AM jun liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Jun, could you please summarize an English version of the release note.
> >>>>> I will send the vote email once it is done.
> >>>>
> >>>> It’s now available here: 
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/blob/2.7.0-release/CHANGES.md#270
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for that, it looks good to me.
> >>>
> >>>> I think it’s time to prepare the upgrade guide and user docs now, which 
> >>>> is also a key part for this release.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, we can do that while we are doing the release vote.
> >>>
> >>> I am starting the vote today.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jun
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jan 17, 2019, at 11:58 PM, Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All the preparation seems going well.
> >>>>> I have successfully uploaded 2.7.0 to staging repo, and upload the
> >>>>> release candidate to svn.
> >>>>> I saw that the release note is still in Chinese.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jun, could you please summarize an English version of the release note.
> >>>>> I will send the vote email once it is done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:48 PM victory <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have check the file , it is the same as pull request #3263.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> 于2019年1月17日周四 下午5:34写道:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Victory,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've mistakenly reverted your recent pull request[1].
> >>>>>>> Luckily I have restored it via the commit email message.
> >>>>>>> I've push it to 2.7.0-release branch already.
> >>>>>>> Would you please help to check it?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3263
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:08 PM victory <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I have review the code and it work well in
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-samples/tree/samples-for-2.7.0-SNAPSHOT/dubbo-samples-configcenter/dubbo-samples-configcenter-apollo
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I have merged this pull request into 2.7.0-release.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> 于2019年1月17日周四 下午2:59写道:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This looks like a blocking issue, I've already tagged 2.7.0, I will
> >>>>>>>>> wait for it and re-do the tagging.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM jun liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I am seeing that all the issue has been cleaned for the 2.7.0
> >>>>>>>>> milestone.
> >>>>>>>>>>> It looks like all the things have been settled, I am planning to
> >>>>>>> tag
> >>>>>>>>>>> the 2.7.0 release today.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> One more issue to be solved before vote.
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks to the suggestions from the Apollo[1] community, I 
> >>>>>>>>>> submitted a
> >>>>>>>>> PR[2] to polish the Apollo extension. Please help to review.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 1. https://github.com/ctripcorp/apollo
> >>>>>>>>>> 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3263
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Jun
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 17, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Huxing Zhang <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I am seeing that all the issue has been cleaned for the 2.7.0
> >>>>>>>>> milestone.
> >>>>>>>>>>> It looks like all the things have been settled, I am planning to
> >>>>>>> tag
> >>>>>>>>>>> the 2.7.0 release today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> dubbo-ops and dubbo-spring-boot-project should be released after
> >>>>>>> Dubbo
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.7.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:02 PM jun liu <[email protected]
> >>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no need to shade gson into dubbo.jar, just need depency
> >>>>>>> gson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> library.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have fixed it .
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246 <
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246> <
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246 <
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Agree.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well done,  merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jun
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 16, 2019, at 4:15 PM, victory <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no need to shade gson into dubbo.jar, just need depency
> >>>>>>> gson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> library.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have fixed it .
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3246
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ian Luo <[email protected]> 于2019年1月16日周三 下午2:34写道:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should not shade gson binaries into dubbo all in one jar
> >>>>>>> file,
> >>>>>>>>> even
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> though there's no license issue. It is simply we should not do
> >>>>>>> this,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead, we should make sure dubbo all in one jar should have a
> >>>>>>>>> transitive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency to gson library.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed it's caused
> >>>>>>>>> by'<include>com.google.code.gson:gson</include>' in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dubbo-all/pom.xml. We should fix it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Ian.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:16 PM jun liu <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed that a third-party source code ‘com.google <
> >>>>>>>>> http://com.google/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .gson.*’
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been compiled into the convenient maven binary jar of
> >>>>>>> 2.7.0 -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dubbo-2.7.0.jar :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ├── META-INF
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── DEPENDENCIES
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── LICENSE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── MANIFEST.MF
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── NOTICE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── assembly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   │   └── bin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── compat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   │   └── dubbo.xsd
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── dubbo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   │   └── internal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── dubbo.xsd
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── maven
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   │   ├── com.alibaba
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   │   ├── com.google.code.gson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   │   └── org.apache.dubbo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── spring.handlers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   └── spring.schemas
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ├── com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   ├── alibaba
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   │   ├── com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   │   └── dubbo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │   └── google
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> │       └── gson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> └── org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> └── apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     └── dubbo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this binary jar (dubbo-2.7.0.jar) will be included in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary Release, should we update the LICENSE or NOTICE file in
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> Binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release to announce the existence of these binary files?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, ‘com.google <http://com.google/>.gson’ is declared to be
> >>>>>>> unde
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> License 2.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can directly download the latest SNAPSHOT release of
> >>>>>>>>> 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here[1] and unzip and check the contents to better understand
> >>>>>>> what
> >>>>>>>>> I am
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to describe here.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/dubbo/dubbo/2.7.0-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jun
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Huxing Zhang <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jun,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you summarize the current status of the 2.7-release
> >>>>>>> branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see there are still several enhancement on this branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As this is the first time to prepare for a release for me, I
> >>>>>>> am
> >>>>>>>>> trying
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to walk through the release steps[1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I might try to deploy snapshot to maven repository.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once we feel it is ready to do the release, I will start the
> >>>>>>>>> formal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>> http://dubbo.apache.org/en-us/blog/prepare-an-apache-release.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huxing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:48 PM jun liu <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice work!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should let the community to participate more in
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process, for example,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. check out a release branch called 2.7.0-release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. encourage people to check it out, test it and report if
> >>>>>>>>> there is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any regressions, bugs or issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. while we are doing the test, we can start going through
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> ASF
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process locally, once we think it is ready to
> >>>>>>> start a
> >>>>>>>>> formal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release note, it can be done very quickly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, we need decide the release manager of 2.7.0
> >>>>>>>>> release. Is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there anyone who volunteer to do that?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I missed this mail.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2.7.0-release has been created
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * we've froze the codebase, test is underway.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to be the release manager if no one is claiming 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great, I can help you with the source/binary packaging and
> >>>>>>>>> tagging
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jun
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 5, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Huxing Zhang <
> >>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 10:45 AM Huxing Zhang <
> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice work!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should let the community to participate more in
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process, for example,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. check out a release branch called 2.7.0-release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. encourage people to check it out, test it and report if
> >>>>>>>>> there is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any regressions, bugs or issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. while we are doing the test, we can start going through
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> ASF
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process locally, once we think it is ready to
> >>>>>>> start a
> >>>>>>>>> formal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release note, it can be done very quickly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, we need decide the release manager of 2.7.0
> >>>>>>>>> release. Is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there anyone who volunteer to do that?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to be the release manager if no one is claiming 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:53 PM jun liu <
> >>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, All
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am writing this mail to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Keep you refreshed of the latest status about v2.7.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Call for efforts on code review and tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Discuss possible release schedules of v2.7.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About v2.7, it’s going to be a milestone version, in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some significant changes. Most importantly, we will complete
> >>>>>>> all IP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clearance related works. Technically speaking, it’s from this
> >>>>>>>>> version on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that a Dubbo release starts fully follows the Apache rules
> >>>>>>>>> (lawfully),
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> totally independent from any other third-party organizations 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> companies.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Secondly, this version will include many new features that 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>> received
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wide attention from the community, by supporting these
> >>>>>>> features,
> >>>>>>>>> we can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better resolve the community’s long accumulated demands. Last
> >>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least, we have made some architectural changes in this 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version,
> >>>>>>>>> made
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dubbo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closer to the micro-service architecture, take the newly
> >>>>>>> introduced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration center as an example, it can work both as the
> >>>>>>> center
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Externalized Configuration at startup and as the center of
> >>>>>>> service
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> management configurations at runtime.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To summarize, the contents already included in the
> >>>>>>> CodeBase
> >>>>>>>>> are:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Config Center: Zookeeper, Apollo, Nacos
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Externalized Configuration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Service governance enhancement: dynamic configuration &
> >>>>>>>>> routing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rule
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Repackage to 'org.apache.dubbo'
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Java 8 support
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Async programming support
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most of the candidates listed above are in the proposal
> >>>>>>> list
> >>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have discussed in some threads before. For a more detailed
> >>>>>>>>> description of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these features or how they are realized, you can refer to the
> >>>>>>> draft
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development documentations within this link[1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to the efforts from the community (especially
> >>>>>>> thank to
> >>>>>>>>> Ian,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CVictory and Minxuan), most of the development work has been
> >>>>>>>>> completed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a round of code review and regression test based on some basic
> >>>>>>> use
> >>>>>>>>> cases
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been completed[2].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now I think it's time to prepare the formal release. One
> >>>>>>> most
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important thing I think we should pay attention to is
> >>>>>>> stability. We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guarantee it's stable enough before release, so we may need to
> >>>>>>> put
> >>>>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort into code review and functional testing. Based on my
> >>>>>>>>> understanding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the CodeBase, such tests may at least continue to last for
> >>>>>>>>> about 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> week,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during this period we may need to `freeze the code`, which
> >>>>>>> means
> >>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimization and bugfix will be allowed. After that, we can
> >>>>>>>>> continue to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evaluate when to start the formal vote process.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/2919
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-samples/tree/samples-for-2.7.0-SNAPSHOT
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jun
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huxing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huxing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huxing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regard!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cvitory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards!
> >>>>>>>>>>> Huxing
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards!
> >>>>>>>>> Huxing
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best Regard!
> >>>>>>>> cvitory
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Best Regards!
> >>>>>>> Huxing
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best Regard!
> >>>>>> cvitory
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Best Regards!
> >>>>> Huxing
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best Regards!
> >>> Huxing
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards!
> >> Huxing
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards!
> > Huxing
>


-- 
Best Regards!
Huxing

Reply via email to