I think it is necessary ,Code will be more clearer and will not be confused with other annotations , like @Service in Spring
kezhenxu94 <[email protected]> 于2019年3月1日周五 上午8:56写道： > > Classes in different frameworks have identical names is widespread. For > example, java nio and netty both have Channel class. > > > I think it's ok for classes because if you import the class from a wrong > package, it's usually a compile time error, > but for annotations, it's not the case. > > > Another example is com.google.inject.Inject (in Guice) and > javax.inject.Inject, but Guice supports the both annotation classes, > meaning it works well event if you import the "wrong" class, but importing > the wrong "Service" may be tricky to debug? > > > > > > > > > 在 2019-02-28 23:05:02，"Taosheng, Wei" <[email protected]> 写道： > >I think it is not necessary. If a shorter name can express its meaning > clearly, we do not need to make it longer. > >Classes in different frameworks have identical names is widespread. For > example, java nio and netty both have Channel class. > > > > > > > > > >------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ > >发件人: "Mercy"<[email protected]>; > >发送时间: 2019年2月28日(星期四) 下午5:17 > >收件人: "dev"<[email protected]>; > >主题: [Discussion] Should we rename the Dubbo's Java anntations with"Dubbo" > prefix? > > > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > > It's an interesting issue[1] that was posted on Dubbo Spring Boot > >Project, the reporter ask to rename the Dubbo's Java anntations with > >"Dubbo" Prefix: > > > >Before: > > > > @Service > > > > @Reference > > > >After: > > > > @DubboService > > > > @DubboReference > > > > > >I think that's fine, What's your opinion? > > > > > >[1]: > >https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/issues/447 > > > > > >Kind regards, > > > >Mercy Ma >
