Hi,

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 4:28 PM yuhang xiu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi, huxing.
>
> Great advice. In the previous review process, I also ignored some issues.
>
> Maybe we need a new label such as: `need-more-review`. When we need more
> reviews, we can mark this pr to remind other committers to review it.

+1 to a label called NEED-MORE-REVIEW. Good idea!

>
> In addition, I think we need to clarify the meaning of `READY-TO-MERGE`. I
> think there is only one case where we will use this label, which is the
> request that is approved, but this pr has not passed ci.

+1

>
> In this pr merger, there are some problems, and we need to pay more
> attention in the future.
>
> Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> 于2019年3月15日周五 下午4:03写道:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looking at the reviewing process of the pull request, I can see some
> > issues here:
> > - No one has officially approved the pull request before it getting
> > merged. By saying officially I mean this[2], which I've mentioned in
> > another thread.
> > - One of the reviewer has marked the milestone as 2.7.2, but applied
> > it with a label called STATUS/READY-TO-MERGE. These two activities
> > look contradictory but according to the context he's meaning I guess
> > is to put some more time to it.
> > - The one who merged this pull request, just merge this pull request
> > without saying anything. I am not sure he mis-understand the
> > STATUS/READY-TO-MERGE label or not. But I think if read the context
> > through, one should be more cautious to merge that pull request.
> >
> > What I think can improve it:
> > - Every pull request must be approved officially by at least one of
> > the committer. (Comments such as LGTM does not mean official
> > approval.)
> > - If you feel uncertain about a pull request, please comment (see step
> > 6 in [2]) that you need more review to come in to review or request
> > review from others directly
> > - If you want to merge the pull request, you must read through all the
> > context.
> >
> > How do you think?
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3549
> > [2]
> > https://help.github.com/en/articles/approving-a-pull-request-with-required-reviews
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:03 PM Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I think we need to revisit pull request 3549 in 2.7.2. In my opinion,
> > > fluent api need to be carefully resigned.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Ian.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards!
> > Huxing
> >



-- 
Best Regards!
Huxing

Reply via email to