It's not yet, sorry about that :-D -Ian.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:24 AM Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote: > ps, just noticed that the pull request [1] has been merged. > > > 1. https://github.com/substack/node-wordwrap/pull/22 > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:22 AM Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We certainly could try to upgrade webpack to the latest version, but >> eslint is another issue, it depends on wordwrap too, see more from this >> issue [1]. >> >> Thanks, >> -Ian. >> >> 1. https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/11536 >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:06 AM Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Feedback from webpack community suggest to upgrade to 4.0, which no >>> longer depend on wordwrap. >>> For the eslint dependency I think a work around should remove it >>> temporally and add it back once the issue has been fixed. >>> >>> How do you think? >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 7:23 PM Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > I also reported the issue in eslint [1] community and in webpack [2] >>> > community. Considering these two tools are widely adopted for >>> javascript >>> > development, they may take this seriously. But from our side, I guess >>> > there's nothing more we could do for now but wait for the responses >>> from >>> > them and what legal team says. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > -Ian. >>> > >>> > 1. https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/11536 >>> > 2. https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/8936 >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:55 PM Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:34 PM Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 3:55 PM Justin Mclean < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Hi, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > This is probably against copyright law, and IMO just because >>> others >>> > > ignore it doesn’t mean we should. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > There probably a couple of courses of action: >>> > > > > - Ask the maintainer of that npm module to replace that file with >>> > > something that's permissible to use. >>> > > >>> > > I filed an issue here: >>> > > https://github.com/substack/node-wordwrap/issues/21, given that the >>> > > commit ceased since 2015, I don't think there will be a quick reply. >>> > > >>> > > > > - Ask on legal discuss for advice, they may have a better idea >>> than me >>> > > on what to do in this situation. >>> > > >>> > > I wrote a email to legal discuss, let's see how they will reply. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > How about removing the file as soon as the npm install is finished? >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > And lastly my -1 is not a veto, you only need 3 +1 and more +1s >>> than >>> > > -1s to release, but I would consider making a release carefully. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks, >>> > > > > Justin >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > -- >>> > > > Best Regards！ >>> > > > Huxing >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Best Regards！ >>> > > Huxing >>> > > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards！ >>> Huxing >>> >>
