Yes, I copied the file from Apache Amabari source code and modified to fix some 
problem, so I need to have license header in the file or in top-level LICENSE 
file?



- Hao

On 3/17/16, 1:58 PM, "Henry Saputra" <[email protected]> wrote:

>When you said "derived from Apache Amabari", did you mean you copied the
>file?
>
>It should have Apache header too in that case.
>
>- Henry
>
>On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Chen, Hao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The app.js file is derived from Apache Amabri because it’s licensed under
>> Apache V2, so don’t need to declare in top-level license file.
>>
>>
>> On 3/17/16, 1:35 AM, "Dendukuri, Hemanth" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >@ Hao,
>> >
>> >Kindly answer below questions.
>> >
>> >eagle-external/eagle-ambari/lib/EAGLE/package/patches/app.js comes from?
>> Although it is a text file, it is 1.7M lines long so I doubt
>> >that you can call it "source code". Was it generated? Was it copied from
>> another project?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Julian,  I will execute below comments without fail.
>> >
>> >MD5, SHA1 and SHA512 matches. I think we should not keep other .sha file.
>> >
>> >Next release, I think you only need the .sha1 file; omit the .sha and
>> .sha512 files.
>> >
>> >Also, I'm not sure if you can add and drop files from directory once the
>> vote is called out.
>> >
>> >In future, do not alter the contents of the release candidate being
>> >voted on. If there are serious issues you will need to cancel the vote
>> >and make a new release candidate; if the issues are not serious you
>> >should make sure to fix them in your next release. Either way, each
>> >release candidate is immutable.
>> >
>> >In this case, the sha of the file matched the sha in the vote thread,
>> >so everything is fine.
>> >
>> >This is the second release candidate, but the email has the same
>> >subject as the first RC. Next time, I suggest that you include the RC
>> >number in the email subject line and the directory name e.g.
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/eagle/0.3.0-incubating-rc2/
>> >so that it is clear what is being voted on.
>> >
>> >Also, I don't think I saw a "[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Eagle Incubating
>> >Version 0.3.0" or "[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Eagle Incubating Version
>> >0.3.0" message. Remember to terminate each vote thread.
>> >
>> >
>> >Regards
>> >Hemanth
>>

Reply via email to