Cazen Lee commented on EDGENT-268:

When I insert a License header at first time, I was working with reference to 
the [Apache Aurora|https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/build.gradle]. 
However, I find that the most of the project using the [2] header when I try to 
search again.

But, same as Justin's opnion and following to the document that you mentioned, 
The purpose of [1] is intended to grant the Copyright and the Apache Licence to 
work that has been already created outside the ASF(APPLY THE APACHE LICENSE TO 

I think that [2] is looks good on the work of the ASF(HEADERS FOR CODE 

> Change licensing header in gradle files
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: EDGENT-268
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268
>             Project: Edgent
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Miscellaneous
>            Reporter: Dale LaBossiere
> The gradle files have ASF license headers but they are of the form specified 
> in [1].  The rest of the source files (java, shell) use the form specified in 
> [2].
> Are the gradle files OK or do they need to be changed to use [2]?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> From Justin: I would go with [2].

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to