[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15571024#comment-15571024 ]
Cazen Lee commented on EDGENT-268: ---------------------------------- When I insert a License header at first time, I was working with reference to the [Apache Aurora|https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/build.gradle]. However, I find that the most of the project using the [2] header when I try to search again. But, same as Justin's opnion and following to the document that you mentioned, The purpose of [1] is intended to grant the Copyright and the Apache Licence to work that has been already created outside the ASF(APPLY THE APACHE LICENSE TO YOUR WORK) I think that [2] is looks good on the work of the ASF(HEADERS FOR CODE DEVELOPED AT THE ASF). > Change licensing header in gradle files > --------------------------------------- > > Key: EDGENT-268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268 > Project: Edgent > Issue Type: Task > Components: Miscellaneous > Reporter: Dale LaBossiere > > The gradle files have ASF license headers but they are of the form specified > in [1]. The rest of the source files (java, shell) use the form specified in > [2]. > Are the gradle files OK or do they need to be changed to use [2]? > [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > From Justin: I would go with [2]. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)